Dear Senators Sir,

Dear Senators Sir, I always stand behind your goal- however, how would you carry out the decision of your Constitutional Court to decide my settlement case? What do you reevaluate when your Constitutional Court released its decision to my settlement case when the Great Congress of a great powerful America has judged my settlement case? How would you reevaluate your Congress service for those who live in the United States? And how would you take an oath when you have become a Congressman? Therefore, I would like to share my cover letter to you when I am struggling for justice in the United States by your Constitution and law, because "Vietnamese people's history is as important as your great powerful American history." And and here is: Respectfully Yours Bright Quang Redwood City, February 18, 2024 Redwood City, February 18, 2024 From: Bright Quang 430 1st Ave Redwood City, CA 94063 Phone: +1(650) 278-9542 Email: quangbright@gmail.com Case number: CIV538988 Confidential Document: 532272 To: Mark B. Busby Clerk of Court United States District Court Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 COVER LETTER Dear Mark B. Busby Clerk of Court Sir, He would like to enforce the order of Clerk of Court- and therefore, him has been called to make an appointment a schedule for free legal information and advice at one of the Legal Help Center at 450 Golden Gate Ave, 15th Floor, Room 2796 in San Francisco- however, there did not respond to him and since, he sent his email to there, but unlucky, it has not only denied his emails but also returned his email by Mail Delivery Subsystem because Your message wasn't delivered to federalprobonoproject@sfbar.org because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail. For that reason, he wasn’t able to carry out the order of Mark B. Busby Clerk of United States District Court Northern District of California by the Legal Help Center. In case, he has come to a few Library Laws to find out the form’s [JDC Template-05/17] because this form wasn’t available to the public online. Next, after approximately one year has gone by, he has sought it at the library Law. Even so, he has written the draft on the JDC Template-05/17 when he would like to submit it to the legal Help Center in 450 Golden Gate Ave, 15th Floor, and Room 2796 in San Francisco, CA 94102. On the other hand, he would think this Legal Help Center has violated to 18 USC § 241- Conspiracy against rights - June 25/1948, and42 U.S. Code § 12203 - Prohibition against retaliation and coercion on July 26, 1990 because the written law of the United States District Court Northern District of California has instructed him to make an appointment to the Legal Help Center which is why it has self-created difficult to deny his appointment. In fact, after reviewing his draft, the Legal Help Center sent its consent to him. Even so, he signed and resubmitted it to the Legal Help Center when it said, “here’s lawyer, but not a legal help center" and gave him a new appointment at 11: OO noon on Friday 5 January 2024. In contrast, the caller was without a phone number, but by an Unknown ID by a woman. Therefore, he asked her and said, “Where are you forming.” She responded and I’m court, he asked, “where is your court placed? She said, "San Jose.” He asked, “Please give me your address.” So, she didn’t answer any words.” Therefore, he quickly reported this matter to the Legal Help Center in San Francisco.” After that, the legal Help Center pushed him to Oakland Court when the man called him and self-introduced by his email. However, he responded to this man that his settlement case does not belong to San Jose and Oakland Courts. (Please review these email attachments.) In case, he would think that they were violatedby18USC§1001(a) Statements or entries generally- June 25.1948, and 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights-(R.S. § 1979;Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.) Because he obeyed the United States District Court Northern District of California, the court has instructed him by a written law which is why the legal Help Center created difficulty to deny his demands. Finally, his settlement case has not only been expressed by the rule of evidence but also carried out by a few American leaders who have confessed wrongful actions in war by their written law. In condition, a legal lawsuit has been carried out by 28 USC§ 1346 the United States as Defendant by the rule of true evidence, and therefore, the legal Help Center couldn’t create difficulty to deny his settlement case. Therefore, he would like to submit his reason which is why the legal Help Center didn’t express how to “Unmitigated Punishment for offenders.” That is why the legal Help Center seemed to express discrimination against the national color race with him; it was prejudiced by the indigenous law for the Vietnamese American prisoner of war. Therefore, he would like to demand the court to overlook the Legal Help Cent while he would the court that ought to the right statutory when he has carried them out in his settlement case by the right United States Congress enacted law. Respectfully Yours