Why did the US use so much ordinance during the Vietnam War?
Because the United States law was to be puppet law which is why the puppet law has taken place for the Vietnam War- for the reason that the puppet law of the United States has been using for the invading foreign wars, the puppet law has never valued by the United States Constitution. Therefore, the president has been walked on the United States Constitution who enacted the ordinances during the Vietnam War.
The ordinances of the United States of America enacted to avoid the United States Congress that never should approve the ordinances. Moreover, the ordinances of the United States Presidents enforced the injustice -power in order to bully many weak foreign nations. However, the United States ordinance can’t enact to invade some of great nations to look like Russia and China and some of nations have owned atomic weapons.
Give consideration to the ordinances of the United States bulled the Republic of Vietnam because the Republic of Vietnam that is weak nation without had excellent pundits like the American pundits In condition, the ordinances of the Government of the United States of America were invaded by the Executive of the United States because of the United States Constitution has never had to allow any American leaderships or any American Presidents who self invaded and assassinated any foreign presidents as like President Kennedy has used ordinance in order to secretly order his ambassador to assassinate President Ngo Dinh Diem and next President Nixon has use ordinance in order to bully president Nguyen Van Thieu in the matter of the Paris Peace Accords, and final, President Reagan has used the ordinance in order to against to the United States Constitution and the America law because of the ordinance of President Reagan has prohibited to enforce the United States law for Prisoners of War but also enacted Reagan’s ordinance to prohibit the prisoner of War because his ordinance donated for the Vietnamese American prisoner of war in which each prisoner of war has eight months benefits to look like immigration benefits - for example, the United States Congress does not only approve the International Geneva Convention the treatment fore prisoners of War in which 75 U.N.T.S 135 October 21, 1950 and the United States Code’s 50 U.S.C 4105 - Prisoner of war- June 24, 1970, during the ordinance of President Reagan has prohibiting performances the American law and the United States Constitution to for example, HR. 5490 Foreign Assistance Act 1963 for the Republic of Vietnam and HR 7885. Public . L 88–205- Approved December 16, 1963. Due to the fact that President Reagan has think that the Southern officers, Politicians and pundits were unlearned guys of the United States Constitution and the American law by the United States Congress, they, President Kennedy, Nixon, and Reagan almost carried out their ordinances, lets them run war crime in order to rob the Republic of Vietnam and then, they sold off the Republic of Vietnam to communism in order to subtract the loans from Mainland China. As result, they have been carrying out the ordinances in order to betray their Constitution or so-called they have walked above the American law and the United States Constitution.
In fact, petition and proposal for hearing of Bright Quang had exactly enforcing for more than 63 the American law and three Amendments to the United States Constitution- however, the ordinances of the United States of America has been distorting all laws and Constitution. In prove:
US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES
Because the United States law was to be puppet law which is why the puppet law has taken place for the Vietnam War- for the reason that the puppet law of the United States has been using for the invading foreign wars, the puppet law has never valued by the United States Constitution. Therefore, the president has been walked on the United States Constitution who enacted the ordinances during the Vietnam War.
The ordinances of the United States of America enacted to avoid the United States Congress that never should approve the ordinances. Moreover, the ordinances of the United States Presidents enforced the injustice -power in order to bully many weak foreign nations. However, the United States ordinance can’t enact to invade some of great nations to look like Russia and China and some of nations have owned atomic weapons.
Give consideration to the ordinances of the United States bulled the Republic of Vietnam because the Republic of Vietnam that is weak nation without had excellent pundits like the American pundits In condition, the ordinances of the Government of the United States of America were invaded by the Executive of the United States because of the United States Constitution has never had to allow any American leaderships or any American Presidents who self invaded and assassinated any foreign presidents as like President Kennedy has used ordinance in order to secretly order his ambassador to assassinate President Ngo Dinh Diem and next President Nixon has use ordinance in order to bully president Nguyen Van Thieu in the matter of the Paris Peace Accords, and final, President Reagan has used the ordinance in order to against to the United States Constitution and the America law because of the ordinance of President Reagan has prohibited to enforce the United States law for Prisoners of War but also enacted Reagan’s ordinance to prohibit the prisoner of War because his ordinance donated for the Vietnamese American prisoner of war in which each prisoner of war has eight months benefits to look like immigration benefits - for example, the United States Congress does not only approve the International Geneva Convention the treatment fore prisoners of War in which 75 U.N.T.S 135 October 21, 1950 and the United States Code’s 50 U.S.C 4105 - Prisoner of war- June 24, 1970, during the ordinance of President Reagan has prohibiting performances the American law and the United States Constitution to for example, HR. 5490 Foreign Assistance Act 1963 for the Republic of Vietnam and HR 7885. Public . L 88–205- Approved December 16, 1963. Due to the fact that President Reagan has think that the Southern officers, Politicians and pundits were unlearned guys of the United States Constitution and the American law by the United States Congress, they, President Kennedy, Nixon, and Reagan almost carried out their ordinances, lets them run war crime in order to rob the Republic of Vietnam and then, they sold off the Republic of Vietnam to communism in order to subtract the loans from Mainland China. As result, they have been carrying out the ordinances in order to betray their Constitution or so-called they have walked above the American law and the United States Constitution.
In fact, petition and proposal for hearing of Bright Quang had exactly enforcing for more than 63 the American law and three Amendments to the United States Constitution- however, the ordinances of the United States of America has been distorting all laws and Constitution. In prove:
US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES
August Term___________________, 2019
PETITION __________
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) BRIGHT QUANG Respondent ) Petitioner V. ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ) Confidential Document: Office of the Democratic Leader ) 532272 H-204, US Capitol ) _________ Washington, DC 20515 ) Self Help: (202) 225-0100 ) Bright Quang V. ) 217 5th Ave # 8 Honorable Jerrold Nadler ) Redwood City, Chairman of the House Committee ) CA94063 On the Judiciary ) 650–278–9542 2132 Rayburn Building ) bright_qng@yahoo.com (mailto:bright_qng@yahoo.com) Washington, DC 20515 ) (202) 225-5635 ) Website: U.S. Representative Jerry Nadler (https://nadler.house.gov/) ) V. ) Honorable Adam Smith ) Chairman of the House Committee ) On Armed Services ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building, ) Washington, D.C. 20515 ) P: (202) 225-4151 | F: (202) 225-9077 ) V. ) Honorable Eliot L. Engel ) Chairman of the House Committee ) On Foreign Affairs ) 2170 Rayburn House Office Building ) Washington, DC 20515 ) Phone: (202) 225-5021 ) Fax: (202) 225-5393 )
CAPITAL CASE
QUESTION/PRESENTED
CAPITAL CASE
QUESTION/PRESENTED
I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America's fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam?
II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets?
III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let's understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family - even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves?
IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what's means?
TABLE OF PARTIES
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………………page
I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED……………………….…………………….. i
II.THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA………………………………. i
III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ……………………………………….…..…IV to VI
IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ………………………. .…………1 to 161
V. OPINIONS BELOW……………………………………………………………….1
VI. JURISDICTION.INTRODUCTION...……………. ………………..……… 2 VII.
BACKGROUND ……………………………………………..…………….….. 3
VIII FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…………………….. .3
IX DISCUSSION...…………………………………………………………………….........96
X. CONCLUSION...........................................................................……….159
XI APPENDIX..…………………………………..…..........................163 to 511
XII. ATTACHMENT........................................................................511 to 512
28 U.S. C. § 453 - Oaths of justices ...............................................................1
28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257……………………………………….……………………1
28 U.S. C§§1254-1651-Jurisdiction............................................................... 1
H. Res. 309 – Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975…………………………………………………...…………………..1
S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………….........................................5
9.11 Particular Rights – First Amendment……………………………..……..6
28 U.S.C §1346b –June25, 1948……………………………………………….7 22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.......….8
22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473.........................................................................9
22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 461………………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322.........21
10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153; Pub. L. 85–729…………………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950...........................................................................................................29
H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…….................................…...….30
H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963.........................32
v
22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961…………………………………………….………………………………......35
22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance Dec. 20, 1975..……………………………………………………………………………….36
5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…….......................................37
18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfullyinfluencing.Sep.14,2007.............................39
26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5).Definition Aug.16,1954..................................40
28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948........................................41
1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950............................43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947….......................................46
1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)(c). United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972...............................................................................................................48
37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966…………...........................…………… ………..51
5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974……….....…...................………….……53
38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958…………...........................…….…56
38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………....….............................…………59
1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64 22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961...…………………………………….…...……65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982................................66
9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………….......…................71
42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals…...…….....……..................74
VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D...........................................................73
Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73 28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….…....................75
California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953…....................78
18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......79
California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.....80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….……………........…………..80
42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………....………………….....……………….………...81
17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998………………...................82
17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action; Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84
42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…......................87
CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…….................89
CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………......................91
28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………....………...............92
44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities; May 22, 1995.............................................................................................. 96
5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..…....................…....98
S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ..………................……...101
vi
50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………….................102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)(c)Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States; July 3,1948.......…................................................…107
28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110 28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure…..................………………………………………………………114
28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..……..................….......116
28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims; June 25, 1948…………………………………………………..….. 117
28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948…………...............120
28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948…............... 120
28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122
28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123
28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948……..................................124
28 U.S.C. § 2678 - Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………....125
28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126 28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129
22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22. Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of Justice……………………………134
22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions……………….............….......135
22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…………................137
22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................139
22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory……........................141
22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980........................................................................................142
22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement.........143
18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture………………………........…............. ..........145
28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)(c) - Review of orders and actions. (Added Pub 107-273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)...............................................................................................149
28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151
In conclusion, if the United States of America does respect the United States Congress and the United States Constitution, the Government of the United States of America must enforce all the laws of the Vietnam War when the United States Congress has been enacting for these super laws, the United States does not enforce the American law so these super laws will be puppet law. Furthermore, the American history and Law studies institute should be answered for the face of nation.
TABLE OF PARTIES
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………………page
I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED……………………….…………………….. i
II.THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA………………………………. i
III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ……………………………………….…..…IV to VI
IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ………………………. .…………1 to 161
V. OPINIONS BELOW……………………………………………………………….1
VI. JURISDICTION.INTRODUCTION...……………. ………………..……… 2 VII.
BACKGROUND ……………………………………………..…………….….. 3
VIII FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…………………….. .3
IX DISCUSSION...…………………………………………………………………….........96
X. CONCLUSION...........................................................................……….159
XI APPENDIX..…………………………………..…..........................163 to 511
XII. ATTACHMENT........................................................................511 to 512
28 U.S. C. § 453 - Oaths of justices ...............................................................1
28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257……………………………………….……………………1
28 U.S. C§§1254-1651-Jurisdiction............................................................... 1
H. Res. 309 – Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975…………………………………………………...…………………..1
S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………….........................................5
9.11 Particular Rights – First Amendment……………………………..……..6
28 U.S.C §1346b –June25, 1948……………………………………………….7 22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.......….8
22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473.........................................................................9
22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 461………………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322.........21
10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153; Pub. L. 85–729…………………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950...........................................................................................................29
H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…….................................…...….30
H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963.........................32
v
22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961…………………………………………….………………………………......35
22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance Dec. 20, 1975..……………………………………………………………………………….36
5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…….......................................37
18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfullyinfluencing.Sep.14,2007.............................39
26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5).Definition Aug.16,1954..................................40
28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948........................................41
1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950............................43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947….......................................46
1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)(c). United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972...............................................................................................................48
37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966…………...........................…………… ………..51
5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974……….....…...................………….……53
38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958…………...........................…….…56
38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………....….............................…………59
1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64 22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961...…………………………………….…...……65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982................................66
9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………….......…................71
42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals…...…….....……..................74
VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D...........................................................73
Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73 28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….…....................75
California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953…....................78
18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......79
California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.....80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….……………........…………..80
42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………....………………….....……………….………...81
17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998………………...................82
17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action; Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84
42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…......................87
CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…….................89
CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………......................91
28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………....………...............92
44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities; May 22, 1995.............................................................................................. 96
5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..…....................…....98
S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ..………................……...101
vi
50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………….................102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)(c)Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States; July 3,1948.......…................................................…107
28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110 28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure…..................………………………………………………………114
28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..……..................….......116
28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims; June 25, 1948…………………………………………………..….. 117
28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948…………...............120
28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948…............... 120
28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122
28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123
28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948……..................................124
28 U.S.C. § 2678 - Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………....125
28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126 28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129
22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22. Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of Justice……………………………134
22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions……………….............….......135
22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…………................137
22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................139
22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory……........................141
22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980........................................................................................142
22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement.........143
18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture………………………........…............. ..........145
28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)(c) - Review of orders and actions. (Added Pub 107-273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)...............................................................................................149
28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151
In conclusion, if the United States of America does respect the United States Congress and the United States Constitution, the Government of the United States of America must enforce all the laws of the Vietnam War when the United States Congress has been enacting for these super laws, the United States does not enforce the American law so these super laws will be puppet law. Furthermore, the American history and Law studies institute should be answered for the face of nation.
