Dear Judge Steven Bailey Sir,
I do think that I was prejudiced national origins under the color because my statement of the case is Civl: 538988, which was prejudiced by our state of California- First Appeal District- Court of Appeal which is why I was not equal in law of the state of California and the United States of America.
Second, I would like you are patiently reading for a few of my statements of the case since, your court's First appellate district had been returned for me for six-times when my case of the Vietnam War that was confidential Document by a low court in San Mateo County.
As you were exactly understood about the Vietnam War by the United States Statutory and proved by the US Statutory:
To prove 22 U.S.C. §§ 1571_1604. P.L 329, 81st Congresses-63 Stat- 714. 23,1950-Mutual Defense Assistance Program [7].
H.R. 5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963. Hearing before of Representatives- Eighty-Eight Congress-From April 23,24,25, and 29, 1963. A question 3:
Q.1.-How well does the present situations vis-à-vis the Vietcong- in its military, political, economic, and social aspects -compare with 6 months ago? What is the evidence on which your appraisal is based?
A. 1.- The most obvious indication of an improvement of the situation is first the confidence of the people in a system which can give them final victory over communism...
____________
7.Furthermore, the United States and Viet-Nam are parties to the agreement for Mutual Defense Assistance in Indochina of December 23, 1950 (TIAS 2447; 3 U.S.T. 2756) which was concluded pursuant to P.L. 329, 81st Congress (63 Stat. 714, 22 U.S.C. 1571- 1604). The sovereignty of Republic of Vietnam was approved by the US Congress that both nations are equal in all. Or December 21, 1951. Excerpt From Mutual Security Act of 1951PublicLaw165—82dCongress Chapter 479—1st Session
H.R. 5113
H.R. 5113
Q. 2.- When the Government of Vietnam and the Government of the United States are working and fighting for the same aim, why is there some mutual irritation, evident and continuous, apparent on both sides? What is the remedy?
A. 2.- One must consider the relationship between the United States and Vietnam as well as the relationship between the United States and the undeveloped countries as contacts between different culture and civilizations and not as a mere temporary pooling of material means to fight against Communist invasion, as people generally think, both among the Vietnam and the America.
Q. 3.- Even go good a friend of Vietnam as Senator Mansfield recently reaffirmed his respect for you, while complaining against "Authoritarian rule." How do you interpret the Senator's remarks?
A. 3.- I have already dealt with the problem of democracy underdevelopment which not only Vietnam but all the underdeveloped countries have to face, and with different ways in which these countries have sought to solve this historic problem during the last 20 years. I have said how South Vietnam, while fighting a war and carrying out a revolution, endeavors for its part to reduce this fundamental contradiction between liberty and forced march forward (U.S News& world Report of Feb. 18,1963)
Now I find that if it is unfair to assess the situation in South Vietnam and in Southeast Asia by the Mansfield report, it would be equality unfair to judge our good friend Senator Mansfield only by this collective and hasty report as well as by the publicity accorded it.
H.R. 7885-- Public law, 88-205, approved December 16,1963
Authorized $3,599,050,000 in foreign aid funds for fiscal 1964. The administration had requested $4.5 billion, the House passed $3.5 billion, and the Senate passed $3.7 billion. Major provisions are:
Funds for fiscal years 1964
Development loans..............................$925,000,000 Development grants.........................................$220,000,000 School and hospitals abroad.................................$19,000,000 Alliance for Progress..........................................$525,000,000 International organizations.................................$136,050,000 Supporting assistance.........................................$380,000,000 Contingency fund...............................................$160,000,000
Military assistance..........................................$1,000,000,000 Administration...............................................$54,000,000 Latin American development...................$180,000,000 Total..........................................................$ 3,599,050,000 Expressed as the sense of Congress that the institution of full investment guaranty programs with all recipient countries would be regarded as a significant measure of self-help by such as countries improving the climate for private investment both domestic and foreign. Also expressed as the sense of Congress that aid should be extended to or withheld from the Government of South Vietnam in the discretion of the President, to further the objectives of victory in war against communism and the return to their homeland of Americans involved in that struggle. Bars assistance under the Development Loan Fund unless the President determines the project is a part of the economic development of the country and specifically provides for appropriate participation by private enterprise. Reduced the development Loan Fund authorization from $1.5 billion to $925 million for fiscal year 1964. Authorizes a total of $220 million in new authority for development
grants and technical cooperation ( excluding Alliance for progress) in fiscal year 1964.
SEC. 406. There are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30,1964, and for each fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may be necessary for the cost of administering the provisions of this Act FEDERAL CONTROL NOT AUTHORIZED
SEC. 407. No department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States shall, under authority of this Act, exercise any direction, supervision, or control over, or impose any requirements or conditions with respect to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction, or administration of any educational institution. Approved Dec. 16, 1963, 11 a.m.
The statutory is 22 USC§2151(a)(b). Sept. 4, 1961
(a)United States development cooperation policy. The Congress finds that fundamental political, economic, and technological changes have resulted in the interdependence of nations. The Congress declares that the individual liberties, economic prosperity, and security of the people of the States are best sustained and enhanced in a community of nations which respect individual civil and economic rights and freedoms and which work together to use wisely the world’s limited resources in an open and equitable international economic system.
To statutory is 22 USC§ 2151 n Human rights and development assistance. Dec. 20, 1975.(a) Violations barring assistance; assistance for needy people. No assistance may be provided under subchapter I of this chapter to the government of any country which engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights, including torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, prolonged detention without charges, causing the disappearance of persons by the abduction and clandestine detention of those persons, or other flagrant denial of the right to life, liberty, and the security of person, unless such assistance will directly benefit the needy people in such country.
(b) Information to Congressional committees for realization of assistance for needy people; concurrent resolution terminating assistance...
(c) Factors considered. In determining whether or not a government falls within the provisions of subsection .
The pursuant 5 U.S.C§ 702 - Right of review (Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966)A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United States: Provided, That any mandatory or injunction decree shall specify the Federal officer or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for compliance. Nothing herein (1) affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or equitable ground; or (2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to suit expressly or implicitly forbids the relief which is sought. and:
To prove Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
To Prove 22 U.S.C. § 1622a. Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of Justice - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 22. Foreign Relations and Intercourse §
The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States, established under Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1954, is hereby transferred to the Department of Justice as a separate agency within that Department.
(Pub. L. 96–209, title I, § 101, Mar. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 96.)
§ 1622b
§ 1622c
§ 1622d
§ 1622e
§ 1622f
§ 1622g
§ 1622b Transfer of functions, powers, and duties of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States Foreign Relations and Intercourse§
All functions, powers, and duties of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission established by Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1954 are hereby transferred with the Commission, together with personnel, assets, liabilities, unexpended balances of appropriations, authorizations, allocations, and other funds held, used, available, or to be made available in connection with the statutory functions of the Commission. The Commission shall continue to perform its functions as provided by the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended [2001 et seq. 50 App. U.S.C.A. § ], the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended [ 1621 et seq. 22 U.S.C.A. § ], and Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1954.
All functions, powers, and duties of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission established by Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1954 are hereby transferred with the Commission, together with personnel, assets, liabilities, unexpended balances of appropriations, authorizations, allocations, and other funds held, used, available, or to be made available in connection with the statutory functions of the Commission. The Commission shall continue to perform its functions as provided by the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended [2001 et seq. 50 App. U.S.C.A. § ], the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended [ 1621 et seq. 22 U.S.C.A. § ], and Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1954.
§ 1622c.(a)(b)(c)Membership of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
(a) Composition of Commission; appointment and compensation of Chairman
The Commission shall be composed of a Chairman and two members. The Chairman shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to serve on a full-time basis for a term of three years, and compensated at the rate provided for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of Title 5 .
(b) Appointment and compensation of members other than Chairman
The other members of the Commission shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and serve on a part-time basis, and be compensated on a per diem basis at a rate of compensation equivalent to the daily rate for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of Title 5for each day that such member is employed in the actual performance of official business of the Commission as may be directed by the Chairman. Each member shall be reimbursed for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by section 5703 of Title 5 for persons in Government service employed intermittently.
(c) Terms of office
The terms of Office of the Chairman and members of the Commission shall be for three years, except the Chairman and members first appointed after the enactment of this subsection shall be appointed to terms ending respectively September 30, 1982, September 30, 1981, and September 30, 1980. The incumbent of any such office may continue to serve until a successor takes office.
§1622d- Appointment and compensation of officers and employees of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States; allowances and benefits; utilization of other Federal facilities
The Commission is authorized, in accordance with civil service laws and in accordance with Title 5 to appoint and fix the compensation of such officers and employees as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Commission. The Commission is authorized to employ experts and consultants in accordance with section 3109 of Title 5 without compensation or at rates of compensation not in excess of the maximum daily rate prescribed for GS-18 under section 5332 of Title 5 . Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commission is further authorized to employ nationals of other countries who may possess special knowledge, languages, or other expertise necessary to assist the Commission. The Commission is authorized to pay expenses of packing, shipping, and storing personal effects of personnel of the Commission assigned abroad, and to pay allowances and benefits similar to those provided by Title IX of the Foreign Service Act of 1946, as amended. The Commission is authorized, with the consent of the head of any other department or agency of the Federal Government, to utilize the facilities and services of such department or agency in carrying out the functions of the Commission. Officers and employees of any department and agency of the Federal Government may, with the consent of the head of such department or agency, be assigned to assist the Commission in carrying out its functions. The Commission shall reimburse such department and agency for the pay of such officers or employees.
§ 1622e-Vesting of all non-adjudicatory functions, powers, and duties in Chairman of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
All functions, powers, and duties not directly related to adjudicating claims are hereby vested in the Chairman, including the functions set forth in section 3 of Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1954 and the authority to issue rules and regulations.
Administrative support and services to Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States by Attorney General
The pursuant statutory is 22 U.S.C. § 1622f. Administrative support and services to Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States by Attorney General 22 U.S.C. § 1622f - U.S. Code The Attorney General shall provide necessary administrative support and services to the Commission. The Chairman shall prepare the budget requests, authorization documents, and legislative proposals for the Commission within the procedures established by the Department of Justice, and the Attorney General shall submit these items to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget as proposed by the Chairman.
(Pub. L. 96–209, title I, § 106, Mar. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 97.)
§1622g - Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States; finality of Commission decisions (Pub. L. 96–209, title I, § 107, Mar. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 97.)
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish the independence of the Commission in making its determinations on claims in programs that it is authorized to administer pursuant to the powers and responsibilities conferred upon the Commission by the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended [50 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.], the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended [22 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.], and Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1954. The decisions of the Commission with respect to claims shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact, and shall not be subject to review by the Attorney General or any other official of the United States or by any court by mandamus or otherwise.
Finally, my ballot was not wrongfully voted for you in order to enforce law let us build an American society equally under law without discriminated national origins under the color which is why I was prejudiced by your court system. In fact, the masterminds of the Vietnam War of the Government of the United States of America were self confessed wrongfully actions oneself that's exact evidence of the Vietnam War of the Government of the United States of America- therefore, I do seek the American justice by rule of law without had political actions.
Respectfully Yours
