His Qoutes

Truth is measured by the tribunal of human conscience." Bright Quang.

Proposal,

To: Bank of America 8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 600 Dallas, TX 75231 Proposal Dear Bank of America Sir, I would like to report the lost money in my account’s 7589 by Microsoft office 365 because I have paid $12.99 to buy Microsoft Office 365 for one month by it gave it’s username to me which was BrightQuang@ BrightQuang.onmcrosoft.com, but it did not allow me to use its Microsoft Office 365. Even worse, why has it been self-purchase in banking checking account number’s 2759 for the four times without having my agreements? Therefore, Microsoft Office 365 has violated 18 U.S. Code § 2113 e- June 25, 1948 - Bank robbery and incidental crimes. For that reason, I have lost my money without having my permission agreed because Microsoft has stolen my money in my account its2759 when I have used my debit card. Therefore, I have requested it to refund back money to me, but it did not have any refund back money to me. In case, it told me to chat with it, but it told me to pay $9, 00 to let it help me to get the refund back. On the other hand, one day Microsoft Office cheats $ 19.99 ten million guys for $19.99. It has earned equal $199, 9900, 000.00 million per day which is why I would like you to have not only helped me but also protected other victims like me on the whole world. For I would like to report my case to the bank of America that helps me to get back money. In my opinion that Microsoft Office was violated crime when it has been self- taken my money in banking account without having agreed by me. And I want the bank to have a lawsuit in the American Court because Microsoft Office 365 has understood about the law which is why it violated criminals four times in my banking account without having my debit card. I will report my case to you by mail delivery soon. According to me, if I order to use Microsoft Office 365, I must pay for it with my visa card while you have sent it to me. I have never violated a crime to freely use it. In fact, Microsoft Office 365 violated my banking account when it never left its phone to let me find it. For example, I have ordered using Microsoft store, I paid $4.99 when it left its bill and phone in my banking account. However, those times it has been stolen in my banking account, it did not leave a phone number- therefore, I did not have contracts with it. And here are: It has been stolen in my banking account $6.97 on January 15/2024, $7.20 January 15, 2024, $4.99 on January 16/2024, and $13.94 on February 5/2024 and $19.99 on February 15/ 2024, totally had $43.09. As you know the phone and address of Microsoft were on its bill which are +1(800)642-7676 and 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052 which is why I have been called to is phone number +1(800) 642-7676 when a woman did not respond, she said inconvenient to answer, please call back. So, I found out on its website, so it told me to pay money to chat. But I did not cheat with its teams because if I could show my account to it, I will close more money with its teams. Therefore, I would like you to get my money back when you may use your attorney team to request the court for this stolen event. Respectfully Yours

His Opinion,

"WASHINGTON — A bankruptcy judge has ruled that Rudy Giuliani, " In his opinion that the United States has not only self-torn its Constitution but also trampled its ethical conscience- when the United States betrayed its close Republic of Vietnam in itself, the United States has trafficked trader Vietnamese people and the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces to socialism because the United States respected evil money more than human dignity. That is why the United States Congress has self-assassinated one excellent million soldiers of the Republic of Vietnam. When two million American troops are actively invading and subverting their close Republic of Vietnam who have been defended by the Vietnamese soldiers. On the other hand, the heart of the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces looked like the American community standards' morality- as such, two American million soldiers did not have any glorious days to return home. Let them organize Heroic Americanism after they cut and ran out of the Republic of Vietnam. Even worse, the United States has not only self- killed its Vietnam ally on the battlefield against international communists but also yet satisfied to kill 300,000.00 the Southern Vietnamese Officials in the concentration camps at hand of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. That is why when the United States Congress has self-enacted H.R. 7885-Pub-L. 88-205 Approved December 16, 1963. 11.00 am., Let the US Congress have been persuaded by the Republic of Vietnam to win against the Vietnamese Communists when the United States Department of Justice Robert Kennedy came to Saigon, let him mobilize President Ngo D. Diem must defeat Vietnamese communists to win it. For what reason, the United States has self-changed the white to black when it sold its Republic of Vietnam to mainland China? Certainly, the United States esteemed the core of national American interests more than its their ethical conscience because the money has hidden their tribunal of American human conscience themselves. In fact, their President Trump was impeached two times, but his political rivals have never forgiven him. That is why his political rivals have entirely tracked him for the long run without having had forgiveness. Rather than using toxicology, Russia and mainland China secretly killed their political rivals by toxicology. In conclusion, the United States destroyed its close Republic of Vietnam within thirty years in an evil war when the United States secretly betrayed it. The United States turned 180 degrees when the United States created doctrine for "salesmanship campaigns by President Johnson." Therefore, on 30 April 1975, the United States pretended to forget its 8 US Code 1157: Annual admission of refugees and admission of emergency situations. June 27.1952, because the United States Congress has stated and said,'' America has no obligation with the South Vietnamese Armed Forces and its H.R. 7885. Pub.L. 88.205 Approved December 16, 1963. 11:00 pm Let the United States allow Democratic Republic of Vietnam to freely assassinate its Republic of Vietnam because the United States will be hopeful for one day that Democratic Republic of Vietnam will solemnly welcome the American Armed Forces to back Cam Ranh Bay. Therefore, the United States killed and cleaned its South Vietnamese troops without having overlooked it. To prove, the Afghanistan War was favorably to three months when the United States would like to welcome them to get evacuation out of their country. In the case of President Trump has tracked down to a well-known finish by the lawless of his properties without having the United States Constitution enacted law like the Republic of Vietnam was used lawless by the United States from President Kennedy to present-time. This is why the properties of Native Americans have been left in the Republic of Vietnam when the United States demanded Democratic Republic of Vietnam to adequately compensate the Native Americans which is why the Vietnamese American prisoners of war that we are maltreated by the great powerful America? Finally, only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches. Bright Quang What does he somehow understand about the Rule of law or rule by the law of the government of the United States of America because Distort justice is a national traitor?

Dear Senators Sir,

Dear Senators Sir, I always stand behind your goal- however, how would you carry out the decision of your Constitutional Court to decide my settlement case? What do you reevaluate when your Constitutional Court released its decision to my settlement case when the Great Congress of a great powerful America has judged my settlement case? How would you reevaluate your Congress service for those who live in the United States? And how would you take an oath when you have become a Congressman? Therefore, I would like to share my cover letter to you when I am struggling for justice in the United States by your Constitution and law, because "Vietnamese people's history is as important as your great powerful American history." And and here is: Respectfully Yours Bright Quang Redwood City, February 18, 2024 Redwood City, February 18, 2024 From: Bright Quang 430 1st Ave Redwood City, CA 94063 Phone: +1(650) 278-9542 Email: quangbright@gmail.com Case number: CIV538988 Confidential Document: 532272 To: Mark B. Busby Clerk of Court United States District Court Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 COVER LETTER Dear Mark B. Busby Clerk of Court Sir, He would like to enforce the order of Clerk of Court- and therefore, him has been called to make an appointment a schedule for free legal information and advice at one of the Legal Help Center at 450 Golden Gate Ave, 15th Floor, Room 2796 in San Francisco- however, there did not respond to him and since, he sent his email to there, but unlucky, it has not only denied his emails but also returned his email by Mail Delivery Subsystem because Your message wasn't delivered to federalprobonoproject@sfbar.org because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail. For that reason, he wasn’t able to carry out the order of Mark B. Busby Clerk of United States District Court Northern District of California by the Legal Help Center. In case, he has come to a few Library Laws to find out the form’s [JDC Template-05/17] because this form wasn’t available to the public online. Next, after approximately one year has gone by, he has sought it at the library Law. Even so, he has written the draft on the JDC Template-05/17 when he would like to submit it to the legal Help Center in 450 Golden Gate Ave, 15th Floor, and Room 2796 in San Francisco, CA 94102. On the other hand, he would think this Legal Help Center has violated to 18 USC § 241- Conspiracy against rights - June 25/1948, and42 U.S. Code § 12203 - Prohibition against retaliation and coercion on July 26, 1990 because the written law of the United States District Court Northern District of California has instructed him to make an appointment to the Legal Help Center which is why it has self-created difficult to deny his appointment. In fact, after reviewing his draft, the Legal Help Center sent its consent to him. Even so, he signed and resubmitted it to the Legal Help Center when it said, “here’s lawyer, but not a legal help center" and gave him a new appointment at 11: OO noon on Friday 5 January 2024. In contrast, the caller was without a phone number, but by an Unknown ID by a woman. Therefore, he asked her and said, “Where are you forming.” She responded and I’m court, he asked, “where is your court placed? She said, "San Jose.” He asked, “Please give me your address.” So, she didn’t answer any words.” Therefore, he quickly reported this matter to the Legal Help Center in San Francisco.” After that, the legal Help Center pushed him to Oakland Court when the man called him and self-introduced by his email. However, he responded to this man that his settlement case does not belong to San Jose and Oakland Courts. (Please review these email attachments.) In case, he would think that they were violatedby18USC§1001(a) Statements or entries generally- June 25.1948, and 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights-(R.S. § 1979;Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.) Because he obeyed the United States District Court Northern District of California, the court has instructed him by a written law which is why the legal Help Center created difficulty to deny his demands. Finally, his settlement case has not only been expressed by the rule of evidence but also carried out by a few American leaders who have confessed wrongful actions in war by their written law. In condition, a legal lawsuit has been carried out by 28 USC§ 1346 the United States as Defendant by the rule of true evidence, and therefore, the legal Help Center couldn’t create difficulty to deny his settlement case. Therefore, he would like to submit his reason which is why the legal Help Center didn’t express how to “Unmitigated Punishment for offenders.” That is why the legal Help Center seemed to express discrimination against the national color race with him; it was prejudiced by the indigenous law for the Vietnamese American prisoner of war. Therefore, he would like to demand the court to overlook the Legal Help Cent while he would the court that ought to the right statutory when he has carried them out in his settlement case by the right United States Congress enacted law. Respectfully Yours

The American Court System,

"The Context: New York Attorney General Letitia James in a lawsuit filed in September 2022 accused Trump, his two adult sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, The Trump Organization and two firm executives, Allen Weisselberg and Jeff McConney of fraudulently overvaluing assets to secure more favorable bank loans and taxation deals." In his opinion that the American Court System has self-taken off shirt lets the human world look by its body because throughout the American Court has been judged Former American President by Jury orders Trump to pay $83 million for defaming columnist E. On Friday, Engoron ruled that Trump will be fined roughly $355 million and be barred from doing business in New York for three years after a monthslong civil trial from late last year. On the other hand, the American Court sentenced Former American President by the defamation which is why the defamation has taken place at the time of Ex-president Trump is the great candidates. For example, between one girl and one man, when the man abused sex on the girl which is why she did not express any the rule of evidence while the man abused sex for her and why did nor report this matter to the police and supervisor in the market and why did not she express any fingerprints of a man who has left on her body or his hair remained on her body? Because the rule of evidence of a lawsuit should be expressed by real evidence, let the lawsuit conquer the rule of law. In contrast, the proxy war's America took place in the Republic of Vietnam from 1948 to 30 April 1975, when a few American leaders who have not only self-confessed wrongful actions in war but also the United States Congress enacted H.R. 7885 Public Law 88-205 approved December 16/1963 by their written law and the rule of evidence which is why the United States has not only betrayed its close Republic of Vietnam ally but also sold it to socialism. Even worse, the United States assassinated President Ngo D. Diem on November 1, 1963, on the excellent million soldiers of the Republic. of Vietnam on 30 April 1975 before the United States cut and ran out of the Republic of Vietnam and 300,000 South Vietnamese officials in the many concentration camps and so much properties of the South Vietnamese Officials without having compensated a penny to the United States's enslaved war by the United States betrayable is its close Republic of Vietnam ally when no articles and Chapters of the United States Constitution allowed those evil matters which is why the American Court sentence its American leaders who have walked on the American law and Constitution. Especially, the Constitutional Court released ratification's decision by compensation to its enslaved war who have been servicing war for the United States of America from 1948 to 30 April 1975, Which is why the Constitutional Court seems to deceive to its enslaved war or so-called is war minions while the United States is richer more than its enslaved war the trillion fold which is why from the United States Supreme Court to the local court always created difficult to deny the rule of evidence of the civil lawsuit. In comparison, we, the American community, the Vietnamese American enslaved war, and the human world, should realize how to Justice of the great powerful America which expresses for the invasion and subversion wars and how would we impress the loyalty, just cause, justice of the United States Constitution? For example, the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution has solemnly ratified July 9/1868. Why does the United States abuse its might to deprive the right to life of the weakest human life? In conclusion, when the American Court sentences Former President Trump, the American Court, how to judge prisoners of war's settlement case? And how do we reevaluate justice of the greatest powerful America for the invasion and subversion wars on the whole world like the Republic of Vietnam and American political rivals? Bright Quang

Let him provide to the Nineteenth Amendment and American Inflation,

Let him provide to the Nineteenth Amendment and American Inflation, The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. Ratified August 18/1920. For this Constitutional Court has released its decision: the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the USA. So, the American citizens ought to enforce this. Next, the American economies is the inflation is bad more than 14% or so-called 45% which is why he would prove the American inflation to increase 45% because before four years, the American workers earned $7.30 per hour when a single house was $650,000. 00, but after increasing salary to $15.per hour, so the single is from 1,800,000.00 which is why the poor American workers couldn't buy any houses. For example, many American markets are empty of customers, but robbers have appeared on the streets when they always and freely robbed the properties of the American business. In conclusion, the American citizens voted to choose their super leader, but the right to count ballots belongs to the American committee election not to belong to American citizens- therefore, the result of ballots has the right of super might party, so the American citizens look like they live under socialism. And the American inflation is pouring on the American heads when they keep their heads down to the boundless enrichments of the sublime American leaders. Therefore, the American leaders wish to sit on their permanent life without having retired. Bright Quang

It should be reviewed Native United States Constitution.

It was the 14th Amendment, first drafted in 1866 and ratified in 1868, that would prove the most far-reaching and that today sits all too squarely between the Native United States and the foreign countries which is why the Native United States has been abusing mighty to have not only invaded and subverted many foreign national countries like the Republic of Vietnam after thirty years in the evil war but also sold its close Vietnam ally to socialism without having compensated a penny to its enslaved war. Therefore, the United States Constitution should be reviewed to correct the Constitutional Court to situation's modern civilization Age that cannot deceive the American people and human world for the long run. Bright Quang

His Settlement Case

Instructions: Writing and Filing a Civil Complaint This Complaint template was prepared by the Justice & Diversity Center, a nonprofit organization, and is not an official court form. It can be used by persons who are not incarcerated to file civil lawsuits in the Northern District Court of California. This template provides guidance only. Using this template does not guarantee any result in your case. HOW TO GET LEGAL INFORMATION AND ADVICE This template provides general guidance. It does not tell you everything you need to know about filing and serving a Complaint. Before filing your Complaint, make an appointment for free legal information and advice at one of the Legal Help Centers listed below. If you will file at the San Francisco or Oakland federal courthouse, do one of the following: Call the appointment scheduling line for the Federal Pro Bono Project: 415-782-8982 Sign up in the appointment book at either: 450 Golden Gate Ave., 15th Floor, Room 2796, San Francisco or 1301 Clay Street, 4th Floor, Room 470S, Oakland Email us at federalprobonoproject@sfbar.org This email is to schedule appointments - no legal advice is given over email. If you will file at the San Jose federal courthouse, do one of the following: Call the appointment scheduling line for the Federal Pro Se Program: 408-297-1480 Monday to Thursday 9:00 am - 12:00 pm, drop in at The Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, 152 North 3rd St., 3rd Floor, San Jose Monday to Thursday 1:00 pm - 4:00 pm, drop in at 280 South 1st Street, 2nd Floor, Room 2070, San Jose CHECKLIST: DOCUMENTS TO PREPARE Along with your Complaint, you need to file some official court forms. These forms are also available at the Legal Help Centers (see page 1), and in a fillable pdf version on the Court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov/Legal-Help-Center-Templates.  Complaint (see instructions below) This is a general complaint template. Other types of complaint templates are available at the Legal Help Centers. Persons who are incarcerated must use a different, official Court form. vCivil Cover Sheet (information form for the Court’s internal records)  Summons with Proof of Service (the Clerk must sign and stamp the summons you have prepared – the completed summons and complaint will be served on the defendant)  Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (request that the court waive the $402 filing fee, if you cannot afford to pay it) HOW TO COMPLETE THIS COMPLAINT TEMPLATE 1. Know your deadlines. You have limited time to file your complaint. If you are not sure of the deadline, contact the Legal Help Centers (see page 1). 2. Review instructions. In the Complaint template, instructions are provided in italicsto guide you. Please read these, as well as Chapter 4 of the Handbook for Pro Se Litigants (see page 4). 3. Provide basic information. Complete pages 1-3 of the Complaint, which provide the Court with information about you (the plaintiff) and the person or entity you are suing (the defendant), the law you are suing under, and why this Court is the correct one to decide this case. 4. Write out the facts. Write a short and simple description of what happened that caused you to file this case. Put each fact into a separate, numbered paragraph, starting with paragraph 6. It is usually best to write the facts in the order that they happened. Start with the earliest time and continue until the most recent event. Include where and when each event happened, who was involved, and what role each defendant played. If you need more pages for your facts, a blank page for copying is at the end of this packet. 5. Write out the claims. A “claim” explains what kind of legal right you are suing about. You may have one claim or several. For each claim, write in the law or right that was violated. Then, write in the name of the defendant who violated that law. Complete your claim by explaining what the law allows or doesn’t allow, what the defendant did to violate that law, and the ways in which you were harmed by what the defendant did. Put each statement into a separate, numbered paragraph. You can briefly repeat facts from your statement of facts. You do not need to include legal arguments or case law. There two claim templates in this packet. If you have more than two claims, a blank page for copying is included at the end. If you need help identifying and understanding your claims, make an appointment at the Legal Help Center (see page 1). 6. You may attach documents to the end of this Complaint as exhibits, but it is not required. If you do attach an exhibit, explain what it is and how it supports your claim. Attaching a document to COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] your Complaint does not necessarily mean that it will be accepted as evidence, and it does not mean that you should leave anything out of the written portion of your Complaint. An exhibit is not a substitute for writing out the details of your claims. 7. Identify your demands. a. Complete the Demand for Relief section on the signature page by writing in what you would like the Court to do for you. b. If you would like to request a jury trial at the end of your case, check the boxes for Demand for Jury Trial on the front and last pages. Not all claims go to a jury trial. 8. Number the pages. Count the number of pages in your final Complaint. In the bottom left corner of each page, insert the page number and the total. 9. Review and sign your Complaint. Read your Complaint, making sure all blanks are filled in, and to confirm that all of the statements are true. Each plaintiff must sign the complaint. Add an additional signature line for any other plaintiffs. 1. Make two copies. Once you have completely filled out and signed your Complaint, Civil Case Cover Sheet, Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (if needed), and prepared the Summons for the Clerk, make two copies of each document. On one copy of each document, write “Chambers” on the top in pen. 2. Deliver or mail the original plus two copies of each form to the Clerk’s Office at the federal courthouse where you are filing your case. The Clerk will take the original and the copy marked “Chambers” of each document. The other copy is for you to keep after it is stamped by the Clerk. If you file by mail, include a self-addressed, stamped envelope so that the Clerk can send a copy of each document back to you. 3. Serve the Complaint. Be sure that the Complaint, Summons, and the documents you received from the Clerk are served on each defendant. a. If you filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and it is granted, the Court will normally order the U.S. Marshalls to serve each defendant. b. If you did not file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, you will need to have someone serve each defendant. For more information on service, contact the Legal Help Center (see page 1) or read Chapter 8 of the Handbook for Pro Se Litigants. STAY UP TO DATE 1. Tell the Court if you move. You must file a notice with the Clerk right away if your mailing address, email, or phone number changes or you may miss important deadlines, causing you to lose your case. 2. Check your mail. Be sure to check your mail regularly for documents from the Court or the opposing side. FILING AND SERVING YOUR DOCUMENTS COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 4 3. A list of all of the documents that have been filed, and (usually) the documents themselves can be viewed online. Review Chapter 7 of the Handbook for Pro Se Litigants (see below), and contact the Legal Help Center to learn about accessing the documents (see page 1). TIMELINE: FIRST STEPS IN A CIVIL CASE This timeline lists the first few things that happen in a civil case. The Legal Help Centers (see page 1) can provide guidance about these steps, and have many additional templates for documents you may need to file during this time and throughout your case. Case begins when the Complaint is filed Defendant responds to the Complaint (usually within 21 days of service) Complaint, Summons, and other documents served on defendants (ASAP) Attend conference with judge to set case schedule (within 90 days of filing) The Legal Help Centers (see page 1) are the best resource for people without lawyers. There are other resources available for understanding the laws and rules of the Court: 1. Handbook for Pro Se Litigants. The Handbook is for people who are representing themselves and it explains basic court rules and procedures. It was prepared by the Court and is available at the Clerk’s Office and on the Court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov/prosehandbk. 2. Legal Research Guide for Pro Se Litigants. The Guide provides information for people who are representing themselves about how to do legal research, like finding statutes and decisions in other cases. It was prepared by the Justice & Diversity Center and is available at the Legal Help Centers and at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/Legal-Help-Center-Templates. 3. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These Rules explain the procedures from filing through trial for all civil cases in the federal courts across the country, and are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf. 4. Local Rules. The Local Rules are similar to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they apply only in this District. They are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/localrules/civil. - 1 - COMPLAINT 1 PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFO 10 Case Number [leave blank] COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL vYes No 21 PARTIES Plaintiff. [Write your name, address, and phone number. Add a page for additional 22 Plaintiffs. ] 23 Name: Bright Quang 24 Address: 430 1st Ave, Redwood City, Ca 94063 25 Telephone: (650) 278-9542 Your Name: Bright Quang Address: 430 1st Ave Redwood City, CA 94063 Phone Number: (650) 278-9542 Fax Number: E-mail Address: quangbright@gmail.com Pro Se Plaintiff Self-Helped Bright Quang Case Number: CIV 538988 Confidential Document # 532272 Court Civil : Unlimited Date Assigned: 06/07/2016 11 12 13 Bright Quang Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 17 18 19 The United States Defendant. 20 - 2 - COMPLAINT 2 PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 1. He would like to self-introduce to the Court because he is a lieutenant Police Chief in a small village in Quang 2. Ngai City, in the Republic of Vietnam from 1966 to 1993, however, from 30 April 1975, the United States 3. has self-torn four multilateral, thirty-seven bilateral treaties, and so many international relations protocols signed 4. with his sacred Vietnam. After the United States cut and run out of the Republic of Vietnam, the US has allowed North 5 Vietnam that it has sent him to many concentration camps in the highland, Vietnam- in the meanwhile, North Vietnam 6 has not only nationalized all his properties like his house, small business but also deprived the right to living his family 7. For example, his wife was homeless and his children have not had any schools to study. After six years he lived in jail, he 8. retuned home on September 1981, the Vietnamese communist regime didn’t give him to do any jobs without having 9. Placesto live- and then, he was leaving his family in Hue City, he escaped to Saigon City where he is working with his 10 tricycles job in homeless. As a result, in November 23, 1993, the United States allowed him and his family to 11 settle in Redwood City, Ca 94063. In the United States, the local government didn’t allow him to enroll any 12 American Universities, but it trained him to work with so many American mental ills, they earned $700.00 per 13 month, but it paid to him only $36. Dollars per month, while it didn’t count any Vietnamese American Veterans 14 benefits and it didn’t carry out any indigenous laws like 26 US C§ 61 Gross income from whatever... because a 15 bilateral treaty of the United States abused power to bully the Republic of Vietnam paid the income tax to the US 16. by 18 UST 546; TIAS 6262.685 UNTS 207, on May 3, 1967, In fact, the United States defendant has three 17. American leaders who have self-confessed wrongful actions in War by their written law and by 28 USC§ 1346 18. The United States as defendant- June 25, 1948. Even so good, the properties of the Native Americans have left in 19. the Republic of Vietnam on April 30, 1975, the United States Department of Justice petitioned to Democratic 20. Republic of Vietnam lets it compensate to the Americans who worked in the Republic of Vietnam by Number 21. of Claims: 534-Number of Awards: 192- Amount of Awards—principal: $99,471.983.51-Amount of fund: 22. $203, 504,248- Amount of Payment: 100 percent principal plus- 80.3 percent interest. That is why he has lost in 23 all of his sacred country by H-R. 7885-88-205 Pub. L. Approved December 16, 1963, and by Section 407. For 24 these reasons, he would like to carry out Rights of the People-Individual Freedom and the Bill of Rights- Chapter 25. 11- Equal Protection of the Law- Nor shall any State California deny to any person within its jurisdiction- the 26, Equal Protection of the Laws. - Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because his life, soul, 27 and mind and heart have ashamedly been so many burdens of sufferings for the Vietnam War, he ought 28 solemnly to struggle for justice in the United States without having the political motives. COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 3 1 Defendants. [Write each defendant’s full name, address, and phone number.] 2 Defendant 1: 3 Name: American President John F. Kennedy 4 .Address: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500 5 Telephone: 202-456-1111-Switchboard: 202-456-1414 6 7 Defendant 2: 8 Name: General William Westmoreland 9 Address: 1000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1000 10 Telephone: 703-571-3343 11 12 Defendant 3: 13 .Name: Secretary of State Henry Kissinger 14 Address: U.S. Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 15 Telephone: Switchboard: 202-647-400 TTY: 1-800-877-8339 16 16 JURISDICTION [Usually only two types of cases can be filed in federal court, cases involving “federal questions” 17 and cases involving “diversity of citizenship.” Check at least one box.] 18 3. H is case belongs in federal court 19 under federal question jurisdiction because it is involves a federal law or right. 20 [Which federal law or right is involved?] 21 28 USC. § 453, 28 US.C§§ 1254-1257, 28 USC§1651, 28 USC§ 1346, 28 USC§1346b chapter-171 . 22 under diversity jurisdiction because none of the plaintiffs live in the same state as any of the 23 Defendants and the amount of damages is more than$75,000. 25 QUESTION/ PRESENTED 26 How does he exactly take cognizance to super legalistic values of the US treaties with his R0V? 27 What did he do to grant a livelihood when the USA left him behind the Paris Peace Accords? 28 What does he carry out 26 USC§ 61-Gross Income during the R0V paid income tax for the USA? COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 4 1 VENUE 2 [The counties in this District are: Alameda, Contra Costa, Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Marin, Mendocino, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, San Francisco, San Mateo, 3 If one of the venue options below applies to your case, this District Court is the correct 4 place to file your lawsuit. Check the box for each venue option that applies.] 5 4. Venue is appropriate in this Court because: 6 A substantial part of the events I am suing about happened in this district. 7 A substantial part of the property I am suing about is located in this district. 8 I am suing the U.S. government, federal agency, or federal official in his or her 9 Official capacity and I live in this district. 10 at least one defendant is located in this District and any other defendants are located 11 in California 12 NTRADISTRICTASSIGNMENT 13 [This District has three divisions: (1) San Francisco/Oakland (2) San Jose; and (3) Eureka. 14 write in the county in which the events you are suing about happened, and then match it to the correct division. The San Francisco/Oakland division covers Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, 16 San Francisco, San Mateo, and Sonoma counties. The San Jose division covers Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz counties. The Eureka division covers Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, 17 Mendocino counties, only if all parties consent to a magistrate judge.] 18 5.Because this lawsuit arose in County of California of San Francisco County, it should be 19. assigned to the United States District Court- Division of this Court. 21 STATEMENT OF FACTS 22 [Write a short and simple description of the facts of your case. Include basic details such as where the events happened, when things happened and who was involved. Put each fact into a separate, 23 numbered paragraph, starting with paragraph number 6. Use more pages as needed.] 24 The plaintiff’s Bright Quang would like to carry out the Declaration of Independence and the 25 Constitution of the United States of America to let him claim his settlement case of the Proxy War 26. America that has not only invaded a legal sovereignty but also sold his sacred country to mainland China 27 when the Declaration of Independence of America’s Founding Fathers has not record any cases like the 28 Vietnam War in the United States Constitution, therefore, he carries out the indigenous laws, international 15 COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 5 1 Laws, and the Hague Conventions and the US treaties which are violated by the American leaders to 2 let him claim the compensation war injuries from the United States that has betrayed his innocent life. 3 Because American leaders didn’t enforce the Congress law, they betrayed their close Vietnam allies. 4 First, according to a legal suit that the United States defendant has three American leaders who have 5 self-confessed wrongful actions in war by their written law, so the American Court does not investigate 6 any reasons when the Declaration of Independence has not allowed any American leaders who have 7 self- enacted the law to invade and subvert any foreign nations like the Republic of Vietnam has 8 approved its sovereignty and the right to self- determination which is why the American leaders 9 have self- violated by their Constitution and laws. For example, President Kennedy has not only 10 Violated by the Second Amendment and 22 US C§2151 September 4, 1961- Congressional findings 11 and declaration of policy which is why President Kennedy has secretly ordered to kill President 12 Ngo D. Diem on November 1, 1963, In the meanwhile, the US Congress enacted law to allow President 13 Kennedy let him bring the American Armed Forces to fight against international Communist out of 14 The Republic of Vietnam which is why he didn’t enforce the section 407 of H.R. 7885- 88-205 Pub.L 15 but President Kennedy changed to kill Ngo D. Diem during Ngo D. Diem has seen him off to his 16 sacred country by the American Government ally. Next, President Johnson has recalled Westmoreland 17 to testify before the US Congress, he said, “ A war of both invasion and subversion” Therefore, 18 President Johnson created his doctrine, “Salesmanship campaign” by Johnson, Westmorland, and 19 The “selling of Vietnam in 1967.” Finally, President Nixon stated, “ No one will have left behind 20 The Paris Peace Accord in 1973, after President Nixon forced President Nguyen Van Thieu who 21 ratified the Paris Peace Accord, if not, President Nixon could order Advisor Kissinger who cut a 22 head’s President Nguyen Van Thieu like President Kennedy has killed President Ngo D. Diem. 23 However, after ratification the Paris Peace Accord, the United States secretly has self-torn the Paris 24 Peace Accord and all of the United States treaties have been signed with the Republic of Vietnam 25 .which is why the United States did not enforce any legal actions with its close Vietnam ally. 26 In conclusion, Secretary of State Kissinger has not only stated, “Vietnam failures We Did to Ourselves. 27 but also quoted, “The Vietnam war required us to emphasize the national interest rather than abstract 28 principles; What President Nixon and I tried to do was unnatural. And that is why we didn’t make it.” COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 6 1 1 First Claims 2 (Name the law or right violated: These the laws are violated by some of the American leaders) 3 (Name the defendants who violated it: President Kennedy 4 [Explain briefly here what the law is, what each defendant did to violate it, and how you were 5 harmed. You do not need to make legal arguments. You can refer back to your statement of facts.] 6 President Kennedy did not carry out the Second Amendment, law and treaties and here are: 7 H.R 5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963. Hearing before Representatives-Eighty-Eighty Congress from 8 April 23, 24, 25 and 29, 1963, and to be H.R 7885 Pub.L 88-205 Approved December 16, 1963, so the 9 Congress cited the Second Amendment in section 2, that President shall be Commander in Chief of the 10 American Armed Forces. Therefore, the Congress enacted the law to allow President Kennedy that he 11 has sent the American Armed Forces to the Republic of Vietnam to fight anti-international communist which 12 is why he didn’t enforce the second 407 of H.R. 7885 when he changed to assassinate President Ngo 13 Dinh Diem and subvert a legal government of the Republic of Vietnam. Even worst, President Kennedy has 14 violated to his America’s founding Fathers because the Constitution has not record this case. Next, President 15 Kennedy has been violated three multilateral treaties which were signed with the Republic of Vietnam. 16 For example, Mutual Defense Assistance treaty on December 23, 1950, Vol.44 (1950) to be 22 USC§§ 17 1571_1604. Pub.L 329-81 St. Congress, 63Stat 714. Dec. 23, 1950. 3 UST 2756; TIAS 2447; 185 UNTS 3 18 and SEATO signed at Manila September 8, 1954 by 6 UST 81; TIAS 3170; 209 UNTS 28, so the USA 19 has ordered to these memberships to bring their soldiers to the Republic of Vietnam by SEATO Treaty 20 V.1075, that treaty registration is number 16434 while the United States has been sponsoring for this treaty. 21 Next, Geneva Conference on July 20, 1954, if President Kennedy has a true heart, he didn’t distort this 22 Geneva Conference on Vietnam which is why the United States sponsored this treaty, but the United States 23 has seen Ngo D. Diem off to his sacred nation. To let him oust Bao Dai King out of the powerful on 23 24 October 1955 while the referendum on 23 October 1955, the United States has self-torn the 1954 Geneva 25. Accords which should be national reunited election after two years were temporary separated by both parts. 26 However, the United States didn’t like it after the United States kicked French invader out of Vietnam. 27 President Kennedy violated 12 UST 3122 TIAS 4717 Agreement effected by exchange of notes signed at 28 Saigon April 4, 1961, that the American Ambassador to the Vietnamese Secretary of State for Foreign COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 7 1 Affairs by No: 152. Let’s the United States would approve the sacred sovereignty of Vietnam which is why 2 this bilateral treaty hasn’t yet dried out off the ink, but President Kennedy has torn it. 3 Agreement relating to investment guaranties under section 413 (b)(4) of the Mutual Security act of 1954, as 4 amended. Exchange of notes at Washington November 5, 1957. Entered into force November 5, 1957. 8 5 UST 1869; TIAS 3932; 300 UNTS 23. That I why President Kennedy didn’t enforce this Act when he 6 changed to inhuman war. Let him destroy the local economic in Vietnam without having regrets. 7 Agreement providing for an information media guaranty program pursuant to section 101 1 of the 8 United States information and educational exchange Act of 1948, as emended. Exchange of notes at Saigon 9 October 11 and November 3, 1955. 6 UST 3940; TIAS 3402; 239 UNTS 195. Why didn’t the United States enforce this 9 89 . critics by demonstrating progress. 10 Act? Agreement relating to the assurances required by the Mutual Security act of 1951. Exchange of notes at 11 Saigon December 18, 1951, January 3, 1952, and January 16, 1952, and January 19, 1952. Entered into force 11 12 January 3, 1952. 3 UST 4672; TIAS 2623; 205 UNTS 127 which is why mainland China has illegally 13 attacked in the Paracel Island on January 19, 1974 while President Nguyen Van Thieu has requested the United 13 attacked 14 States ought to enforce this treaty, but the United States didn’t care about this battle. 15 The United States has not only approved the sovereignty of the Republic of Vietnam but also respected the 16 publications by Agreement relating to the exchange of official publications. Exchange of notes at Saigon April 17 4, 1961, Entered into force April 4, 1961 12 UST 310; TIAS 4717; 405 UNTS 77. 18 Agreement relating to duty-free entry and defrayment of inland transformation charges on relief supplies 18 and packages, Exchange of notes at Saigon August 29 and 26, 1954, Entered into force August 26,1954. 19 5 UST 2531; TIAS 3115; 234 UNST 111. Why didn’t President Kennedy enforce this treaty? 20 Law and Customs of War on Land (Hague, IV) Convention signed at the Hague October 18, 1907, with 21 annex of regulations. Senate advice and consent to ratification March 10, 1908. Ratified by the President of 22 the United States February 23, 1909. Procѐs-verbal of first deposit of ratification (including that of the United 23 States) at The Hague date November 27, 1909. Entered into force January 26, 1910. Proclaimed by the 24 President of the United States February 28, 1910, Section II and III of the regulations supplemented by 25 convention of August 12, 1949, 1 relative to protection of civilians in time of war, as between contracting 26 parties to both conventions; chapter II of the regulations complemented by conventions of July 27 1929,2 27 .and August 12, 1949,3 relative to treatment of prisoners of war, as between contracting parties, 3 Stat.2277; 28; Treaty 539, which is why President Kennedy did not carry out this Hague Convention in the Vietnam COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 8 1 War when President Kennedy assassinated his close Vietnamese leader by the United States Congress enacted 2 laws and murdered the Vietnamese civilian like his father who was killed by the American bombs and bullets . 3 1 6 UST 3516; TIAS 3365. 2 TS 846, post, vol.2. 3 6 UST 3316; TIAS 3364. Why does not the United States carry 4. out this treaty for the Vietnamese American prisoners of war when this war has built by the Unites States? 5. Agreement providing for an informational media guaranty program pursuant to section 101 1 of the United States 6. States information and educational exchange Act of 1948, as amended. Exchange of notes at Saigon October 11, 7. and November 3, 1955, Entered into force November 3, 1955, 6 UST 3940; TIAS 3402; 239 UNTS 195. 8 Mutual Security, Agreement relating to the assurances required by the Mutual Security Act of 1951. Exchange of 9. notes at Saigon December 18, 1951, January 3, 1952, January 16, 1952, and January 19, 1952, Entered into force 10. January 3, 1952, 3 UST 4672; TIAS 6223; 205 UNTS 127 which is why the President of the United States was 11. Represented by the United States Congress to bring the American Armed Forces to the Republic of Vietnam, 12. but President Kennedy didn’t enforce any laws to fight against international communism. In contrast, President 13 Kennedy assassinated and subverted his close Vietnam ally to let the plaintiff endure so many burden of 14. suffering like the lost properties, his sacred country, and his father died by the American bombs and bullets. . 15. SECOND CLAIMS 16. (Name the law or right violated Treaties, indigenous law, international law, Hague Convention 17. (Name the defendants who violated it: General Westmoreland violated his indigenous law, The Hague.) 20, [Explain briefly here what the law is, what each defendant did to violate it, and how you were harmed. 18. You do not need to make legal arguments. You can refer back to your statement of facts.] 19. He would like to briefly explain about General Westmoreland who is one of three American leaders that have 20 become the United States’ defendant by 28 USC§ 1346 the United States as the defendant and 28 USC§ 21 1346b-Junes 25, 1948-Chapter 171-Tort Claims procedure. Even good, the United States’ defendant has 22. three American leaders who self-confessed wrongful actions in war by their written law. Therefore, 23 according to a legal suit to jurisdiction Court judges to these laws because his life and his father’s life have 24 hardly accumulating our properties from our ancestors which are why the American leaders did not enforce any 25. Indigenous laws, international treaties, and The Hague Conventions while they did not fight against socialism, 26. but they betrayed and subverted their close Vietnam ally to sell all of the value properties, human dignity, 27 humanism to enemy socialism without having compensated a penny. Here are the laws of General 28. Westmoreland violated: 1 Johnson, Westmoreland and the ‘Selling’ of Vietnam. “Www.nytimes.com. 2017/05/09. Opinion” COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 9 2 by Author Gregory A, Addis. In 1967, President Johnson has recalled General Westmoreland from the 3 Vietnam battlefields to let him testify hearings before the United States Congress-while General 4 Westmoreland said, “A war of both invasion and subversion,.” Therefore, President Johnson created his 5 doctrine that’ “salesmanship campaign” For this reason, on 30 April 1975, the United States cut and run 7 out Vietnam. After that, General Westmoreland’s on behalf of the United States Armed Forces, I would 8 like to apologize to the Vietnamese of South Vietnam Armed Forces for the abandoning you guys.” However, he didn’t 9 carry out the Geneva Convention relative to Treatment of Prisoners of war 75 UNTS 135, entered into force October 10 21, 1950, while the United States Congress ratified this Act.38 USC§1151 Claims veterans Affairs. 11 Why has General Westmoreland cut and run out of the Republic of Vietnam without having enforced 12. Agreement relating to the disposal of United States excess property in Vietnam? Exchange of notes at Saigon 13. November 9, 1968. Entered inti force November 9, 1968. 19 UST 6703; 702 UNTS 293. Why did the 14. Republic of Vietnam pay the Income tax for the United States, but the United States abandoned its close 15. Vietnam ally? Agreement regarding Income tax administration. Exchange of notes at Saigon, March 31 16. and May 3, 1967, entered into force May 3, 1967. 18 UST 546; 6262,685 UNTS 207. 17. And the United States didn’t pay any pensions of the gross income form whatever by 26 USC§ 18. 61? Why did the Department of Defense not carry out 50 USC§4105. Prisoners of war-June 24, 1970 19 when the United States Congress enacted law H.R.7885. Bub;L. 88-202 Approved December 20. 16, 1961, to allow President Kennedy who brought his troops to seize and subvert hiss close Vietnam ally. 21. What does he enforce 50 USC§ 4101 (a)(b)(c) Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United 22. States; July 3, 1948. What does he do for his injured health, mind, soul, and heart by 18 USC§ 2340 23 Torture, because General Westmoreland has hatched conspiracy to betray its close Vietnam ally? 24 10 USC§2733: Property loss; Person injury; or death: incident to noncombat actives of Department of 25. Army, Navy, or Air Force (August 10, 1956) in Effect on January4, 1995. Which is why the United States 26. Army has been coming to the Republic of Vietnam from December 16, 1963 to 1975, but didn’t defeat 27 international communist while subverted its close Vietnam ally to kill so many innocent Vietnamese civilians. 28. like his father and his life to be imprisoned by its unjust law. Therefore, he would follow with this Act when the United States COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 10 1should compensate for $100,000,000.00 (one hundred millions dollars to look like the number case of 2 the Department of Justice has requested the Democratic Republic of Vietnam ( North Vietnam) 3. compensated for the Native Americans who worked and left out of the Republic of Vietnam on 30 April 4 1975. Next, 42 USC§ 1981(a)(b)(c)-Equal rights under law. November 21, 1991. 5.18 USC §1001(a)(b)- Statements or entries general-June 25, 1948. Why was General Westmoreland to be 6. made knowingly and willfully to the law of the Vietnam War? Because the United States Congress 7 enacted law to defeat international communist when Westmoreland testified hearing before the Congress 8. he said, “A war of both invasion and subversion” to let President Johnson create his salesmanship campaign doctrine 9. to betray his close Vietnam Ally. H.R 309- Recognizing the 44 anniversary ofthe Fall of Saigon on 30 April 1975. 10 That 116 th Congress (2019-2020) all information (Except Text) saying, “The resolution honors the contributions of 11. Vietnamese Americans and honors the service of member of the U,S. Armed Forces and the South Vietnamese 12. Forces who fought in Vietnam, including those who gave their lives,” As a result, the Congress has not only 13. recognized for plaintiff’s Bright Quang to be legal rights which is why Westmoreland did not give any benefits 14.of the US veterans and prisoners of war, However, he came to the United States after twenty years left him at 15. the hand of Vietnamese enemy. Why does the United States use the South Vietnamese Forces to be enslaved 16. war of a great powerful America? According to H.R 632 evacuate to be the Vietnam Human Assistance and 17. Evacuation Act of 1975 (H.R. 6096) was US, congressional legislation that proposed to designate financial 18. resources for the evacuation and humanitarian aid of South Vietnam preceding the Fall of Saigon which is 19. why this Act H.R 6098 failed to pass because Senator Joe Biden stated, “I am ready to vote any money needed 20.to bring American soldiers and Americans out of South Vietnam back to the United States, but I will not give a 21. a penny for evacuation and resettlement of any one person. Viet Yet, the United States have no responsibility 22.to save any one person or 100,001 Vietnamese; the United States has no responsibility to them, The Victory 23. of the Vietnamese communist was because they {the Vietnamese} refused to fight anti-communism. He said to 24. look like President Bush’ son who stated, “ South Vietnam didn’t fight for their freedom which is why they do 25.not have it today,” Therefore, Bright Quang would like to cite 42 USC§ 2000aa-6-(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h) 26. Civil actions by aggrieved person, That is why the United States Congress enacted the law when the 27. American employees have not only discriminated against the national color but also prejudiced by the 28. indigenous laws while the court has ordered to make a schedule at federalprobonoproject@sfbar.org. But it is COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 11 1deception to him. S 484 Bring Them Home Alive Act of 2000 106 th, Congress Feb.25.1999. Which is 2why the United States Department of Defense didn’t enforce this Act when it has thought him and the 3 South Vietnamese officials look like the American animals, because when we are younger guys, we are 4 servicing for the proxy war’s America and paying the income tax to the United States. But even when the 5United States did not use us, the United States did not pay a penny. Why does a great powerful and 6 modern civilized American has dishonored to him? When the human dignity of prisoners of war is less 7 valued more than the illegal immigrants, the United States applies method to squeeze the lemon juice and 8 threw lemon skin out. After twenty years, the United States, abandoned us, the United States did not 9 support any pennies to pay the ticket –plane. He came to the United States has trained with a job-coli. 10 He would carry out 911 Particular Rights by the United States Courts for the Ninth Circuit because his settlement 11 case is the rules of evidence when he would carry out the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 12 He would worry about the court may have almost no insight to the deepest of the subject of the Vietnam 13 War. For example, he has knowingly been sought so many Native American attorneys which are why they 14. didn’t dare to help for him like the law company In New York City signed a contract with him by Case No: 15 0935 on May 6, 2011, but it has self-cancelation and so far, Clerk Court’s Mark B. Busby who ordered him to 16 line for the Federal Pro Bono Project: 415-782-8982 to sign up 450 Golden Gate Ave., 15th Floor, Room 17. 2796, San Francisco, and Email us at federalprobonoproject@sfbar.org, as a result, even when he is 18 contracting with the Federal Pro Bono Project: 415-782-8982. So, it sent its contract form to him when he 19 signed on it, but it didn’t sign and it forced him to sign up at San Jose Court. He didn’t like when it forced 20 him to sign up at Oakland Court. Please review some emails attachment. To prove, Testimony and 21 Documents relating to the Court Martial of William L. Calley by United States v William L. Calley, JR. 22. (No. 26.875) United States Court of Military Appeals 22 U.S.M.A.534. December 21, 1973. However, this 23 court didn’t compensate a penny to the innocent Vietnamese people in which looked like the United States 24. cut and run out of the Republic of Vietnam after the United States sold it to mainland China while the United 25 States played hands-off policy in the Vietnam War. Why did not Department of Defense carry out 37 USC§ 26 552 (a)(b)(c) September 6, 1966, Pay and allowances; continuance while in a missing status; limitations because 27. no multilateral and bilateral treaties of the United States signed with its close Vietnam ally to have abandoned 28 the Republic of Vietnam. To providing 38 USC§ 101 Definitions. September 2, 1958, why did not COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 12 1. Department of Defense protect the rights of the Vietnamese American prisoners of war because the 2 United States Congress has not only approved by the enacted law to recognize the Fall of us, which 3 is why does Department of defense forget to our merits in serviced war? 38 USC§ 1311-Deendency 4 and indemnity compensation to a surviving spouse. July 3, 1947, why did not Department of Defense 5 apply for the Vietnamese American Veterans benefits when the law of the Congress recognized him to the 6 Vietnamese American veterans? To prove, 22 US Code § 7108-September 22, 1961-Actions against significant 7 traffickers in persons. Let him carry out the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution that 8 the United States has not only defended its American people who are all born or naturalized in the United 9 States by ratified July 9, 1868 but also no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the 10 privileges or immunizes of citizens that is why General Westmoreland has not only abused power to 11 traffickers him but also sold him to socialism. Let him point out that the United States has no obligation of 12 conscience to protecting for the Vietnamese people like Senator Joe Biden stated: (see above or Pages 516 13 book’s Justice for Vietnam by author Bright Quang submitted to the court already.) Even worst, the United 14 States does not have any rights to interfere into the inner government of the Republic of Vietnam. After 30 15 years in war, the United States Department of Defense has not only betrayed us but also sold the Republic 16 of Vietnam to international communist under form’s traffickers’ persons. Let him prove to 28 USC§ 4101 17 (1)(2)(5)(6)Definition-August 10,2010, According to the Vietnam War that the Congress has enacted 18 the indigenous law, the United States treaties, and international law to defamation to a Vietnamese people 19 that the United States Department of Defense has been ruined a foreign national Republic of Vietnam when 20 the United States did not enforce any promises with its close Vietnam ally by the written laws, but the United 21States didn’t compensate any a penny to a close Republic of Vietnam ally of the United States which is why 22 has the United States Armed forces defamed the South Vietnam Armed Forces? S 2040 (4)(5)(7) justice 23 Against Sponsors of Terrorism. September 11, 2001, Terrorism of international communist has been 24 terrorizing for the whole world. For example, on October 15, 1964, a Vietnamese communist spy terrorized 25 a bomb on Justice Bridge in Saigon to assassinate the United States Secretary of Defense McNamara which is 26 why General Westmoreland has sponsored the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) by the United 27 States Department of Defense. To let North Vietnam defeat South Vietnam when the South Vietnam Armed 28 Forces is mightier than North Vietnam. To prove, 26 USC§ 1501-Privilege File Consolidated returns- COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 13 1 August 16, 1954, which is Secretary of Defense did not carry out this Act to the Republic of Vietnam 2 Armed Forces who paid the Income tax to the United States by May 3, 1967. Why did Secretary of 3Defense violate to this ASubject 27-1. Army in the Vietnam War? 4 Third CLAIMS 5. (Name the law or right violated: Indigenous law, international law, the Hague Convention, treaties 6. (Name the defendants who violated it: Secretary of State Kissinger is the defendant ) 7 18 US C§ 371- Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States. June 25, 1948, because 8 Secretary of State Kissinger has self-confessed wrongful actions in war by his written law in himself. 9 In fact, he said, “Vietnam failures we Did to ourselves.” By Source: Huffington Post. 9/29/10. Breaking 10 News which is why Mr. Kissinger didn’t enforce section 407 in H.R. 7885 Pub.L. Approved December 16, 1963. 11 18 US C§ 2381 Treason. June 25,1948. because he quoted and said, “The Vietnam War required us to 12 emphasize the national interest rather than abstract principles. What President Nixon and I tried to do was 13 natural. And that is why we didn’t make it.” Why did not Secretary of State Kissinger violate to his 14 Constitution? While no Articles and Chapters of the US Constitution allowed any American leaders to 15 build the war to deprive the right properties to foreign nations like Kissinger did in his close Vietnam ally. 16 Why did Mr. Kissinger betray his close Vietnam ally when he killed one excellent million Republic of 17 Vietnam Armed Forces while the United States Constitution didn’t allow the Congress that it enacted law 15 18 to murder any foreign nations allies of the United States like close Vietnam ally? 19 1 USC § 112a - United States Treaties and Other International Agreements; September 23, 1950. In fact, why has not 20 Secretary of State Kissinger compiled and edited the Geneva Conference and Paris Peace Accord to submit them 21 to the United States Congress? But Secretary of State Kissinger published the number # Volume-935-No: 13300, 19 22 lets Geneva agreement and Paris Peace Accord lack legal rules of evidence- and therefore, the United States 23 did not enforce those treaties. If those treaties were entirely enforced by the United States, so his properties, 24 business and honest life could not be lost in all. Even good, the United States would enforce the Geneva Accord 25 was stipulated by the temporary separating two parts in two years on the 17 th parallel, we, the Vietnamese 23. 26. people should be general elections on July 1956, which is why the United States didn’t lets us to express the 27 right to self- determination. That is why the United States has seen leader Ngo Dinh Diem off the United States. 28 On the other hand, leader Ngo D. Diem eats a holy cake, drinks holy water, and worships one God together with COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 14 1 President Kennedy which is why President Kennedy killed Ngo D. Diem and didn’t lets him to enforce the 2 Geneva Accord. Next, the Paris Peace Accord has included 9 Articles, but no Articles and Chapters sold the 3 Republic of Vietnam to socialism and sent him to many concentration camps by North Vietnam. In fact, Article 2 4 says, “The Agreement responds to the aspiration and fundamental national rights of the Vietnamese people, i,e., 5 the independence, sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity of Vietnam, to the right of the South-Vietnamese people to self- 6 determination, national independence, and the improvement of relations among countries. The 7 Agreement and the Protocols should be strictly respected and scrupulously implemented. This is why 8 Secretary of State Kissinger has self-torn this multilateral treaty? 18 US C§ 2340-Definitions (Added Pub.L.. 9 103-236,title V. § 506(a),April. 30, 1994. If Secretary of State Kissinger is strictly carrying out the Paris 10 Peace Accords, so the wonderful life of plaintiff didn’t have any injuries from the Vietnamese communist spies have 11 tortured him when he lived in the concentration camps. Because it tortured him to exploit the secret information of 12 Department of police of the Republic of Vietnam by the gun of the Vietnamese communist spies on his head. Therefore, his ears were deaf and his mind, soul, heart were injured health without having any medications’ 13 treatments by the war-wounds. To prove, 18 US C§ 112 (a) (c) June 25, 1948, Protection of foreign 14. Officials which is why the United States has self-killed his leader’s Ngo Dinh Diem to let the United 15. States build chaos to lose his sacred country and his Vietnam Armed Forces to be disloyalty. Let him 16. prove to 22 USC§ 2152n (a)(b)- Human rights and development assistance. December 20, 1975. Why 17. didn’t the United States carry out this Act to the Republic of Vietnam? Why does the United States 15. 18. distort this Act to push his family and him, his father family to fall into ruin house and to lost nation? 16. 19 Why does the United States distort this Act to let the United States push him to enslaved war? 17. 20. 35 U.S. C. § 183 –Right to compensation – July 19, 1952 because President Ngo D. Diem 21. was granted a patent for the Republic of Vietnam, that created patent is withheld by the United States 22 to guide it to ruin the lost Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he’d like to carry out this Act to request the 23. Court’s compensation. 28 US C § 2672 - Administrative adjustment of claims. June 25, 1948 Advisor 24 Kissinger self- confessed wrongful actions in war and said, “Vietnam failures we did to ourselves.” 25 The mastermind of the Vietnam War of Advisor Kissinger has not only distort the United States Congress 26 Act but also betrayed and sold the Republic of Vietnam to socialism. 22 US C § 1622a - Transfer of Foreign 27. Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of Justice The Foreign Claims settlement 28 Commission of the United States, established under Reorganization Plan Number 1 of 1954, is hereby COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 15 1 transferred to Department of Justice as a separate agency within that Department. Let him would like 2 to ask for the Court that ought to carry out this Act. 3 22 US C § 1622b-Transfer of function, powers, and duties of Foreign Claims Settlement of the United 4 States (Pub.L. 96-209, Title, 1,§ 102, March 14, 1980,94 Stat. 96)>et him would like to point out the law 5 from 22 US C § 1622b, 22 US C § 1622c, 22 US C § 1622d, 22 US C § 1622e, 22 US C § 1622f, 6 22 US C § 1622b, to 22 US C § 1622g that the United States or so-called the Congressional Court has 7 ordered to the American Courts and the foreign Clams who was born in the United States and naturalized that 8 he or she would like to carry out this Act to submit to the American Courts whatever relating for international 9. Claims Settlement Act of 1949, which is why the American Courts have not only created to difficulty to let them 10. deny his settlement case but also prejudiced indigenous laws. To prove, before he would like to petition to 11. the American Courts, he would ask for the United States Supreme Court that it has pleasurably been advised 12 what him to have interestingly legal suit from the local Courts to the United States Supreme Court to 13 procedure which is why the local courts also created always to difficulty to express to discriminate against 14 the national color racism. Even good, he would continue to carry out to 28 US C § 2671- Definitions June 25, 15 1948, 28 US C § 2672-Administrative Adjustment of Claims, June 25, 1948, 28 US C § 2673- Report to 16. the United Congress, June 25, 1948, 28 US C § 2674-Liability of the United States, June 25, 1948, 28 US 17. C § 2675 (a)(b)(c)- Deposition by federal agency as Prerequisite; evidence. June 25, 1948. 28 US C§2676 18Judgement as Bar, June 25. 1948. Judgment ad Bar, 28 US C§2677.-Compromise, June 25, 1948, which is 19 20. why did the American Court carry out this Act with him, but the Courts always denied to his settlement case? 2128 US C§2678-Attorney fees; penalty, June 25, 1948. Let him would like to point out Native Attorneys 22. that their studies are decided by the Constitutional Court that he or she should share with 25% of total grants 23. which is why they have been bullied him to deny the help. Because the ethical conscience of the native 24. attorneys is frank integrity to express loyalty, just cause, and justice of the United States Constitution without 25. distorted justice which is why the native attorneys didn’t dare expressively to bravely protect their objective 26. truth. 28 US C§2679(a) (b) (A)(B)(C)(D)-Exclusiveness of remedy June 25,1948. The United States 27 Congress has clearly ordered to the Department of Justice that should be remedy to provide the right to 28belonging’s plaintiff to follow under section 1346 b because the plaintiff does not against the United States 2828 COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 16 1 while he struggles for justice in the United States. Because not the United States Constitution allowed 2 any American leaders who distorted the United States Constitution, that is why the American courts did not accept 3. the right to claim exclusiveness by decision of the Constitutional Court. Let him would like to carry out 50 US C § . 4. 4101 - Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States- July 3, 1948, which is why Secretary 5 of State didn’t control his employees who worked in Vietnam. To let them destroy their close Vietnam ally. 6 H.RES.309 (116th Congress): RESOLUTION. Recognizing the 44 th anniversary of the Fall on April 30, 1975. 7. To follow with RESOLUTION of the United States Congress, that is why he has not only discriminated t 8 against the national color race but also he was maltreated by the critical race theory because the United 9. States Congress has solemnly confirmed him by whereas members of the South Vietnamese military fought 10. side-by-side with the United States Armed Forces in defense of the ideals of democracy and freedom. 11. Which is why we were abandoned at enemy’s hand without having compensated any veterans’ benefits? 12 However, the United States Congress has not only honored us to boundlessly enrich the United States, but 13 also had not reminded any our merits while we dedicated ourselves to the US in the past. 42 US C§2000D. July 14. 2, 1964, Prohibition against exclusion from participation in, denial of benefits of, and discrimination under 15. Federally assisted programs on ground of race, color, or national origin. That is why he has not only serviced 16 for the national interests of the United States but also lost his sacred country by the United States hands off 17 policies which is why Secretary of State Kissinger has never requested his nation to support benefits to his 18. enslaved war. 28 US C§ 4101(1) Judiciary and judicial Procedure§ 4101. Definitions. January 01, 2018, 19 because the American leaders haven’t lost their America’s Founding Fathers, they have not feel dishonored. 20. In fact. That is why they have dishonored him because they are mightier than him. For example, Secretary 21. of State Kissinger has stated, “ Assassination, “It is an act of insanity and national humiliation to have a law 22 prohibiting the President from ordering assassination.” (Statement at National Security Council meeting, 1975) 23 Next, why did President Bush’s son humiliate to the South Vietnamese Armed Forces when he stated, 24 “South Vietnam didn’t fight for their freedom which is why they do not have it today?” While his nation has not 25 only betrayed his close Republic of Vietnam ally but also sold us to international communists while he has 26 dishonored us? Finally, John Kerry was an American lieutenant when he was struggling for his veteran benefits. 27 So, he testified in hearings before the US Congress in 1971, Just because, he followed the US Congress law 28 when he came to Vietnam to let him fight against socialism. But he was testifying before the US Congress in1971 COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 17 1 he praised his enemy when he dishonored his close Republic of Vietnam ally. (Transcript: Kerry Testifies 2 Before Senator Panel, 1971.(See pages 471 the book Just for Vietnam by Author Bright Quang-ISBN 978-6624- 63 3 87-7. Page Publishing Company in the USA. His book would submit to the court already) 4. Why did Secretary of State Kissinger dishonor to the South Vietnamese Armed Forces after he sold us to 5 socialism? Let him would like to enforce this. 28 US C§ 1502 - Treaty cases June 25, 1948, which is why 6 the Constitutional Court has order to the Department of Justice, but the American Courts didn’t review to his 7settlement case when they always create to difficulty to deny him. Why did not Secretary of States enforce the 8 United States treaties with the Republic of Vietnam after signed? And Why didn’t the Department of Justice 9 enforce the decision of the Constitutional Court in this Act? 26 U.S.C§ 7701(5) (14) Definitions Aug. 16, 1954 10 ch. 736, 68A Stat. 911; Pub. L. 86-70. Because he has been paid the income tax to the 11Government of the United States from May 3, 1967 to 1974. S 484-(A)(B) (3)Bring them home [106th 12Congress Public Law 484] the Bill of Rights Amendments. In fact, a decision of the Constitutional Court 13has ratified him to be a member of the United States Armed Forces already- therefore, the US Congress 14ordered to bring them to the American home which is why Secretary of State Kissinger didn’t help him to 15 apply the veteran benefits. H. Res: 293 by Action: 2017-05-23 (Summary) Tracking information)That is 16 why the Constitutional Court didn’t enact its law to the Vietnamese American prisoners of war. Foreign 17Assistance Act of 1963: Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Eighty-eighth Congress, First Session 18 on H. R 5490, as Amended, and for other Purpose. So, the United States Congress has self- enacted this Act to 19 volunteer assistance for the Republic of Vietnam, Le’s fight against international communists. However, 20 President Ngo D. Diem didn’t send any international relations of protocols to proposal to the Government of 21 the United States of America to send the United States Armed Forces to come to his Republic of Vietnam. 22 Why didn’t the United States keep promises with its close Republic of Vietnam ally? These are the United 23 Statestreaties when Secretary of State Kissinger did not enforce with his close Vietnam ally. 24 Taxation: Agreement regarding Income tax administration, Exchange of notes at Saigon March 31, 25and May 3,1967. Entered into force May 3, 1967, 18 UST 546; TIAS 6262; 685 UNTS 207. Exchange of 26 notes at Saigon. December 16, 1969, and February 12, 1970. Entered 27into force February 12, 1970, 21 UST 1 148; TIAS 6869; 745 UNTS 312 28To prove, 28 US C§ 357.(a)(b)(c) Review of orders and actions (Added Pub. L. 107-275, div. C, title, COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 18 1§ 11042 (a) November 2, 2002. Especially, he is hopeful to the court that has not created difficulty to deny 2his settlement case because he would carry out the rule of evidence and the written law. 3 He would like to carry out 28 US C§1828- Special Interpretation services-Oct.28.1978 because Mark B. 4 Busby Clerk of the Court and Anna Sprinkles have ordered me to sign up an appointment, but the attorney 5did not help him. Please contract for discussing between the attorney and me. Therefore, I’d like the Court 6to order a translator to help for his settlement case. 6 DEMAND FOR RELIEF [State what you want the Court to do. Depending on your claims, you may ask the Court to award you money or order the defendant to do something or stop doing something. If you are asking for money, you can say how much you are asking for and why you should get that amount, or describe the different kinds of harm caused by the defendant.] 7 Bright Quango’s plaintiff would like to demand the court to award to compensation money damages 8 damage by the defendants who have been built up the Vietnam War to anti- American law and the United States 9 Constitution that is the same as the United States Department of Justice that requested North Vietnam to compensate money 10 to the Native Americans who had left their properties in the Republic of Vietnam in a legal case by the Paris Peace Accords 11 didn’t carry out by the United States Defendants. Which is why his properties, his father’s property, and his alive father 12 have had suddenly deprived the right to life to live and lost sacred national Republic of Vietnam. In the meanwhile, 13 his ancestor properties and his job and his family, and business were completely lost by the Vietnam War. That is why 14 the United States Defendant has not only self- anti indigenous law, the United States Constitution, and The Hague 15Conventions and international law. While the United States Defendant is one of the five great powerful countries, 16which is why the United States has solemnly represented by the United Nations Organization - therefore, he would 17 like to demand to the court to award the loss damage by one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000.00 US dollars 18 within nearly thirty-years of the proxy war of America in Vietnam. After that, the United States Defendant has not 19 only had self-torn all of multilateral, thirty-seven bilateral treaties, and international relations of protocols signed with its 20close Republic of Vietnam ally. Let the United States Defendant protect their core of national interests during the US 21defendants are richer more than its plaintiff more than trillion-fold. 22 In conclusion: 23For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff appellant respectfully requests that the Court gives and orders for 24 granting the compensation benefits for suitable with the United States Constitution and Statutory 25because power is short life, justice is long-lasting. 26Respectfully Yours- 27Bright Quang 28- ID. Xxx-xx-9115 COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 19 1 2 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 3 [Check this box if you want your case to be decided by a jury, instead of a judge, if allowed.] 4 Plaintiff demands a jury trial on all issues. 5 6 Respectfully submitted, 7 8 9 10 . I declare under penalty of perjury under laws of the state of California and the United States of America 11. that the information I have provided on this form and all attachments is true and correct by the rule of 12. evidence. 13. Date: 14 15 15. . Print Name: Sign name . 16 17. Attachments: 18. The book Justice for Vietnam ISBN 978-1-6624-6387-7 by Author Bright Quang which is fullest of 19. exact evidence of the settlement case. American Council for voluntary international Action. Name: 20. Nguyen Xuan Quang, Huyen Ton Nu Thi Ngu, Nguyen Thi Bich Lien, Nguyen T, Bich Thu, 21. Nguyen T. Ton, Nguyen T. Tri and Nguyen T, Thang. No. 261689204 TNS Registration No: 22. A073319309. Birth Certificate: the registered Child: Nguyen, Thi Bich Thuy, the Registered Child: 23. Nguyen, B, Duc. Departure Number: 92937096103- SFR 1401 –Nov.22,1993- Nguyen T. B. Lien. 24. Departure Number: 92937096103- SFR 1401 –Nov.22, 1993-Nguyen Bich Thu Thi. Departure: 25. 92937096103- SFR 1401 –Nov.22, 1993- Nguyen T. Ton. Departure Number: 92937096103- SFR- 26. 1401 Nov 22, 1993- Nguyen . Tri . Departure Number: 92937096103- SFR 1401 –Nov.22,1993- 27. Nguyen T. Thang. Departure Number: 92937096103- SFR 1401 –Nov.22,1993-Nguyen Quang 28. Xuan. Departure Number: 92937096103- Date: February 20, 2024 Sign Name: BRIGHT QUANG Print Name: COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 20 SFR 1401 –Nov.22,1993-Huynh T.N.T Ngu Thi. The 1 Republic of Vietnam- The Department of Finance: Tax Collection-Form: 06-TT/MB- BUSINESS LICENSE- 2. Name of The Applicant: Huyen Ton Nu Thi Ngu –Group 62.. SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM- PEACE- 3. FREEDOM-HAPPINESS. Camp: Dai Bin Lam Dong- Number 293 GRI 25807806142- Certificate of Dismissal 4 From Camp. Full Name: Nguyen, Quang Xuan. 5. In the Court of Appeal of the State of California- The First Appellate District- Division Five 6. Bright Quang, plaintiff- Conference: Case: 538988- Filed vs. The United States of America- Defendant- 7. Respondent- Confidential Document: # 532272-June 1, 2017. Received –Apr 25, 2018- Charies D. Johnson, Clerk. 8. Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo- Hall of Justice – 400 County Center, Room A-Redwood City, 9. CA 94063- Plaintiff Bright Quang- CIV: 538988- Civil Unlimited – Case Summary Case: No, 538988. File Date 10. 06/07/2016. U.S. Department of Justice. Office of the investor General. December 1,2011. Supreme Court of 11. California. November 2, 2009. Commission on Judicial Performance 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400. 12. San Francisco, CA 94102. Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo- Hall of Justice-400 County 13. Center- Redwood City CA 94063. Commission on Judicial Appointments-350 McAllister Street * San 14. Francisco. CA 94102. May 18, 2011. Supreme Court of the United States- Office of Clerk-Washington, DC 20543-0001. January 20, 2015. 15. U.S. Department of Justice- Office of the Solicitor General. Washington, DC. 20530- May 2, 2006- Via 16. U.S.Mail U.S. Department of Justice- Office of the Solicitor General- Washington, DC, 20530. Executive 17. Officer. Apr. 1, 2016. Via U.S. Mail. Court of Appeal- Office of the Clerk- First Appellate District 350 18. McAllister Street. San Francisco 94102-4712. April 21, 2017. U.S. Department of Justice- Civil Rights 19. Division- Criminal Section- PHB 950Pennsylvania Ave. NW- Washington, DC.20530- JFF: milky – 144- 20. 11-0, 1072780- Mar 8, 2019. Supreme Court of the United States- Office of the Clerk- Washington, DC 20530- . 21. 0001- March 21, 2019. U.S Department ofJustice. JPG- U.S. Department of Justice- Office of the Solicitor 22. General- Washington, DC 20530. DGS. California Department of General Services- Governor Edmund G. 23. Brown Jr. 02/23/2018. RE: Claim 17006626 for Bright Quang. Viet-Nam- Exchange of Official Publications- 24. Agreement effected by exchange of notes 1961. - Signed at Saigon April 4, 1961; Entered into force April4, 25. The American Ambassador to the Vietnamese Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs – Embassy of the United 26. States of America- Saigon, April 4, 1961. No. 152, TIAS 4717. Heinonline-12.1 U.S.T. 310 2.- 27. Boston (November 24)—The Kennedy Library has released 37 hours of tape recordings meetings, memos 28. phone calls and dictation of President John F. Kennedy, including four hours of tape long help by Kennedy COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 21 1 secretary Evelyn Lincoln. National Security Archive 35+ years of Freedom of information 2. Action. New Light in a dark comer: Evidence on the Diem coup in South Vietnam, November 1963, Opinion 3. VIETNAM’ 67-Johnson, Westmoreland and the ‘selling’ of Vietnam by Gregory Daddis – May 9, 2017. (4 pages) 4. Nation & World- The Seattle Time- Kissinger: Vietnam Failures “we did to ourselves” by Robert Burns. Letter 5. from President Nixon to President Nguyen Van Thieu of the Republic of Vietnam-January 5, 1973(Released April. 6. 30, 1975. The White House- Washington- November 18, 1973. The White House-Washington –December 17, 7. 1972. The White House- Washington- November 14,1972, Human Rights Library- Geneva Convention relative to 8. the Treatment of Prisoners, 0f War- 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950. . 9 10Bibliography A Completed Programs - Vietnam | FCSC | Department of Justice www.justice.gov/fcsc/completed-programs-vietnam Number of Claims: 534: Number of Awards: 192: Amount of Awards - Principal: $99,471,983.51: Amount of Fund: $203,504,248: Amount of Payment: $100% of Principal plus , Kissinger: Vietnam failures `we did to ourselves’ | The ... https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/... Sep 30, 2010 · Henry Kissinger, who helped steer Vietnam policy during the war’s darkest years, said Wednesday he is convinced that “most of what went wrong in Vietnam we did to ourselves” ... , Vietnam Veterans Against the War Statement by John Kerry www2.iath.virginia.edu/.../VVAW_Kerry_Senate.html Vietnam Veterans Against the War Statement by John Kerry to the Senate Committee of Foreign Relations April 23, 1971 I would like to talk on behalf of all those veterans and say that several months ago in Detroit we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged, and many very highly decorated, veterans testified to war crimes ... Completed Programs - Vietnam | FCSC | Department of Justice www.justice.gov/fcsc/completed-programs-vietnam Number of Claims: 534: Number of Awards: 192: Amount of Awards - Principal: $99,471,983.51: Amount of Fund: $203,504,248: Amount of Payment: $100% of Principal plus Johnson, Westmoreland and the ‘Selling’ of Vietnam https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/opinion/johnson... May 09, 2017 · Johnson, Westmoreland and the ‘Selling’ of Vietnam. By Gregory Daddis. May 9, 2017; Gen. William Westmoreland appearing before a joint session of Congress in 1967. Petition2Congress COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 22 https://www.petition2congress.com/ctas/prisoner-war-proxy-war-america H.R. 7885—[12] Public law, 88-205, approved December 16, 1963 Authorized $3,599,050,000 in foreign aid funds for fiscal 1964 Why did the Government of the United States of America promise to win communism but not keep it after seized whole the Republic of Vietnam , the American Government was torn shred American laws of the Vietnam War? Recognizing the 42nd anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on ... https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hres293 42 USC Section 1983- Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights The Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights Act is commonly known as Section 1983. The purpose of the Act is to provide a private remedy for violations of Federal Law. Section 1983 states: "Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation Federal Bureau of Investigation - U.S. Department of Justice https://www.justice.gov/vta/fbivta Nov 01, 2017 · The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigates terrorist attacks against US citizens in the US and abroad. The Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence Divisions of the FBI work with domestic and foreign partners to neutralize terrorist cells and operatives here in the US, to help dismantle extremist networks worldwide, and to cut off financing and other forms of support provided ... As used in this chapter and sections 1346 (b) and 2401 (b) of this title, the term "Federal agency" includes the executive departments, the judicial and legislative branches, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the United States, but does not include any contractor with the United States. [USC02] 28 USC Ch. 171: TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE Summary of S. 484 (106th): Bring Them Home Alive Act of ... https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/106/s484/summary Full text of "Legislative History, Public Law 88-205, H.R ... https://archive.org/stream/PL88205/PL88205_djvu.txt Due to a planned power outage, our services will be reduced today (June 15) starting at 8:30am PDT until the work is complete. We apologize for the inconvenience. §1402. United States as defendant (a) Any civil action in a district court against the United States under subsection (a) of section 1346 of this title may be prosecuted only: (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides; [USC05] 28 USC 1402: United States as defendant uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section1402&nu... As used in this chapter and sections 1346 (b) and 2401 (b) of this title, the term "Federal agency" includes the executive departments, the judicial and legislative branches, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the United States, but does not include any contractor with the United States. COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 23 [USC05] 28 USC Ch. 171: TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part6/chapter171&edition=... . Henry Kissinger- Public Enemy #1- and His Lawless Reign ... https://aim4truth.org/2017/03/14/henry-kissinger... Mar 14, 2017 · “It is an act of insanity and national humiliation to have a law prohibiting the President from ordering assassination.” Henry Kissinger (National Security Council meeting, 1975) We live in a lawless nation. The Wild West pales in comparison to the ... Bibliography B BOSTON (November 24) -- The Kennedy Library has released 37 hours of tape recordings of meetings, memos, phone calls and dictation of President John F. Kennedy, including four hours of tape long held by Kennedy secretary Evelyn Lincoln. CNN - Kennedy White House tapes offer new insight ... www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/11/25/kennedy.tapes/ www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/11/25/kennedy.tapes/ . Opinion | Johnson, Westmoreland and the ‘Selling’ of ... https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/opinion/johnson... May 09, 2017 • He lauded his soldiers’ performance in rescuing a Saigon government “on the verge of defeat,” while highlighting the complexities of this kind of war — “a war of both subversion and invasion, ... . WESTMORELAND: THE GENERAL WHO LOST VIETNAM March 29, 2021 Comments Offon WESTMORELAND: THE GENERAL WHO LOST VIETNAM 2,416 Views The My Lai Massacre and Courts-Martial: An Account 22 US C §§ 1571_1604. P.L 329, 81st Congresses - 63 Stat- 714- December 23, 1950 to be multilateral treaty (MUTUAL DEFENSE ASSISTANCE IN INDOCHINA AGREEMENT SIGNED AT SAIGON DECEMBER 23, 1950; ENTERED INTO FORCE DECEMBER 23, 1950 Signed in Saigon (TIAS 2447; 3 U.S.T. 2756) which was concluded pursuant to P.L. 329, 81st Congress (63 Stat. 714, 22 U.S.C. 1571-1604). H.R. 5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963- Hearing before of Representatives- Eighty-Eighth - Congress-From April 23, 24, 25, and 29, 1963 The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Hague Convention ... https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/ASubjScd-27-1_1975.pdf COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 24 I • ASubjScd 27-1 . Army Subject Schedule. I . HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 27-1 Washington, D.C., 29 August 1975 . THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949 . FBI Headquarters | Federal Bureau of Investigation https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/fbi-headquarters Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners ... hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/y3gctpw.htm Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950. PART I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. ... by the prisoner of war and by the prisoners' representative concerned, at least three weeks before the opening of the trial, then the latter cannot take place and must be adjourned. . VNR Vietnam Review: Paris Accords 1973 Documents ... https://quandiemvietnam.blogspot.com/2020/05/... Jul 05, 2021 • Signed at Paris on 27 January 1973 . Authentic texts: English and Vietnamese. Registered by the United States of America on 13 May 1974. (ab) CAMBODIA, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF VIET-NAM, FRANCE, LAOS, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, STATE OF VIET- NAM, UNION OF SOVIETSOCIALIST REPUBLICS, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND and U.S. Constitution - First Amendment | Resources ... https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1 First Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners ... hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/y3gctpw.htm Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950. PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 The High Contracting Parties [USC02] 22 USC 7108: Actions against significant ... https://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=22§ion=7108 §7108. Actions against significant traffickers in persons (a) Authority to sanction significant traffickers in persons (1) In general. The President may exercise the authorities set forth in section 1702 of title COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 25 50 without regard to section 1701 of title 50, or section 1263 of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (subtitle F of title XII of Public Law 114–328; 22 U.S.C ... 1 U.S. Code § 113 - “Little and Brown’s” edition of laws ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/113 1 U.S. Code § 113 - “Little and Brown’s” edition of laws and treaties; slip laws; Treaties and Other International Acts Series; admissibility in evidence. The edition of the laws and treaties of the United States, published by Little and Brown, and the publications in slip or pamphlet form of the 'The US has no obligation': Biden fought to keep ... https://tartanmarine.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-us... Jul 05, 2019 • As a senator, the future vice president, now 76, was adamant that the U.S. had "no obligation, moral or otherwise, to evacuate foreign nationals," dismissing concerns for their safety as the North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong swept south toward Saigon in 1975. 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983 Effective Date of 1979 Amendment. Amendment by Pub. L. 96–170 applicable with respect to any deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws occurring after Dec. 29, 1979, see section 3 of Pub. L. 96–170, set out as a note under section 1343 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volume ... https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1961-63v02/d108 Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volume II, Vietnam, 1962 108. Letter From the Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional Relations (Dutton) to the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (Fulbright) 1 Washington, March 14, 1962. [USC02] 28 USC Ch. 171: TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part6... 22 U.S. Code § 2151 - Congressional findings and ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/2151 (a) United States development cooperation policy. The Congress finds that fundamental political, economic, and technological changes have resulted in the interdependence of nations. The Congress declares that the individual liberties, economic prosperity, and security of the people of the United States are best sustained and enhanced in a community of nations which respect individual civil and ... . COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 26 . 22 U.S. Code § 2601 - Refugees and migration | U.S. Code ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/2601 Nov 24, 1998 • References in Text. This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (c)(1), (d), and (f), was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 87–510, June 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 121, as amended, known as the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, which enacted this chapter, amended section 1404 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality, repealed sections 1925(a), (c), (d), and 1951(c) of this title ... . 42 USC Section 1983- Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights The Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights Act is commonly known as Section 1983. The purpose of the Act is to provide a private remedy for violations of Federal Law. Section 1983 states: "Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation Civil Rights Requirements- A. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq. ("Title VI") Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity that receives Federal funds or other Federal financial assistance 28 U.S. Code § 4101 - Definitions | U.S. Code | US Law ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/4101 28 U.S. Code § 4101 - Definitions. (1) Defamation.—. The term “ defamation ” means any action or other proceeding for defamation, libel, slander, or similar claim alleging that forms of speech are false, have caused damage to reputation or emotional distress, have presented any person in a false light, or have 18 U.S. Code § 1705 - Destruction of letter boxes or mail ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1705 Prosecutions for theft of mail matter are invariably made under that section whereas this section is used as basis for prosecutions for malicious mischief to mail boxes or receptacles. By Postal Regulations (1928), section 700, paragraph 2, an ordinary letter box is ... . FBI Headquarters | Federal Bureau of Investigation https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/fbi-headquarters Our Headquarters is located between 9th and 10th Streets in northwest Washington, D.C. The closest Metro subway stops are Federal Triangle on the Orange/Blue lines, Gallery Place/Chinatown and Metro Center on the Red line, and Archives/Navy Memorial on the Yellow and Green lines. As the FBI has grown, some Headquarters functions have moved to oath... Defamation – Mooradian Law, APC Defamation Defamation Bibliography A & B COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 27 Completed Programs - Vietnam | FCSC | Department of Justice www.justice.gov/fcsc/completed-programs-vietnam Number of Claims: 534: Number of Awards: 192: Amount of Awards - Principal: $99,471,983.51: Amount of Fund: $203,504,248: Amount of Payment: $100% of Principal plus ... , Kissinger: Vietnam failures `we did to ourselves’ | The ... https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/... Sep 30, 2010 · Henry Kissinger, who helped steer Vietnam policy during the war’s darkest years, said Wednesday he is convinced that “most of what went wrong in Vietnam we did to ourselves” ... , Vietnam Veterans Against the War Statement by John Kerry www2.iath.virginia.edu/.../VVAW_Kerry_Senate.html Vietnam Veterans Against the War Statement by John Kerry to the Senate Committee of Foreign Relations April 23, 1971 I would like to talk on behalf of all those veterans and say that several months ago in Detroit we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged, and many very highly decorated, veterans testified to war crimes ... Completed Programs - Vietnam | FCSC | Department of Justice www.justice.gov/fcsc/completed-programs-vietnam Number of Claims: 534: Number of Awards: 192: Amount of Awards - Principal: $99,471,983.51: Amount of Fund: $203,504,248: Amount of Payment: $100% of Principal plus Johnson, Westmoreland and the ‘Selling’ of Vietnam https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/opinion/johnson... May 09, 2017 · Johnson, Westmoreland and the ‘Selling’ of Vietnam. By Gregory Daddis. May 9, 2017; Gen. William Westmoreland appearing before a joint session of Congress in 1967. Petition2Congress https://www.petition2congress.com/ctas/prisoner-war-proxy-war-america H.R. 7885—[12] Public law, 88-205, approved December 16, 1963 Authorized $3,599,050,000 in foreign aid funds for fiscal 1964 Why did the Government of the United States of America promise to win communism but not keep it after seized whole the Republic of Vietnam , the American Government was torn shred American laws of the Vietnam War? Recognizing the 42nd anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on ... https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hres293 42 USC Section 1983- Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights The Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights Act is commonly known as Section 1983. The purpose of the Act is to provide a private remedy for violations of Federal Law. Section 1983 states: "Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation Federal Bureau of Investigation - U.S. Department of Justice https://www.justice.gov/vta/fbivta Nov 01, 2017 · The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigates terrorist attacks against US citizens in the US and abroad. The Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence Divisions of the FBI work with domestic COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 28 and foreign partners to neutralize terrorist cells and operatives here in the US, to help dismantle extremist networks worldwide, and to cut off financing and other forms of support provided ... As used in this chapter and sections 1346 (b) and 2401 (b) of this title, the term "Federal agency" includes the executive departments, the judicial and legislative branches, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the United States, but does not include any contractor with the United States. [USC02] 28 USC Ch. 171: TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE Summary of S. 484 (106th): Bring Them Home Alive Act of ... https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/106/s484/summary Full text of "Legislative History, Public Law 88-205, H.R ... https://archive.org/stream/PL88205/PL88205_djvu.txt Due to a planned power outage, our services will be reduced today (June 15) starting at 8:30am PDT until the work is complete. We apologize for the inconvenience. §1402. United States as defendant (a) Any civil action in a district court against the United States under subsection (a) of section 1346 of this title may be prosecuted only: (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides; [USC05] 28 USC 1402: United States as defendant uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section1402&nu... As used in this chapter and sections 1346 (b) and 2401 (b) of this title, the term "Federal agency" includes the executive departments, the judicial and legislative branches, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the United States, but does not include any contractor with the United States. [USC05] 28 USC Ch. 171: TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part6/chapter171&edition=... . Henry Kissinger- Public Enemy #1- and His Lawless Reign ... https://aim4truth.org/2017/03/14/henry-kissinger... Mar 14, 2017 · “It is an act of insanity and national humiliation to have a law prohibiting the President from ordering assassination.” Henry Kissinger (National Security Council meeting, 1975) We live in a lawless nation. The Wild West pales in comparison to the . BOSTON (November 24) -- The Kennedy Library has released 37 hours of tape recordings of meetings, memos, phone calls and dictation of President John F. Kennedy, including four hours of tape long held by Kennedy secretary Evelyn Lincoln. CNN - Kennedy White House tapes offer new insight ... www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/11/25/kennedy.tapes/ www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/11/25/kennedy.tapes/ COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 29 . Opinion | Johnson, Westmoreland and the ‘Selling’ of ... https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/opinion/johnson... May 09, 2017 · He lauded his soldiers’ performance in rescuing a Saigon government “on the verge of defeat,” while highlighting the complexities of this kind of war — “a war of both subversion and invasion, ... . WESTMORELAND: THE GENERAL WHO LOST VIETNAM March 29, 2021 Comments Offon WESTMORELAND: THE GENERAL WHO LOST VIETNAM 2,416 Views Bibliography B The My Lai Massacre and Courts-Martial: An Account 22 US C §§ 1571_1604. P.L 329, 81st Congresses - 63 Stat- 714- December 23, 1950 to be multilateral treaty (MUTUAL DEFENSE ASSISTANCE IN INDOCHINA AGREEMENT SIGNED AT SAIGON DECEMBER 23, 1950; ENTERED INTO FORCE DECEMBER 23, 1950 Signed in Saigon (TIAS 2447; 3 U.S.T. 2756) which was concluded pursuant to P.L. 329, 81st Congress (63 Stat. 714, 22 U.S.C. 1571-1604). H.R. 5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963- Hearing before of Representatives- Eighty-Eighth - Congress- From April 23, 24, 25, and 29, 1963 The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Hague Convention ... https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/ASubjScd-27-1_1975.pdf I • ASubjScd 27-1 . Army Subject Schedule . I . HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 27- 1 Washington, D.C., 29 August 1975 . THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949 . FBI Headquarters | Federal Bureau of Investigation https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/fbi-headquarters Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners ... hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/y3gctpw.htm Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950. PART I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. ... by the prisoner of war and by the prisoners' representative concerned, at least three weeks before the opening of the trial, then the latter cannot take place and must be adjourned. . VNR Vietnam Review: Paris Accords 1973 Documents ... https://quandiemvietnam.blogspot.com/2020/05/... Jul 05, 2021 · Signed at Paris on 27 January 1973 . Authentic texts: English and Vietnamese. Registered by the United States of America on 13 May 1974. (ab) CAMBODIA, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF VIET-NAM, FRANCE, LAOS, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, STATE OF VIET-NAM, UNION OF SOVIETSOCIALIST REPUBLICS, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND and U.S. Constitution - First Amendment | Resources ... https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1 First Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners ... COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 30 hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/y3gctpw.htm Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950. PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 The High Contracting Parties [USC02] 22 USC 7108: Actions against significant ... https://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=22§ion=7108 §7108. Actions against significant traffickers in persons (a) Authority to sanction significant traffickers in persons (1) In general. The President may exercise the authorities set forth in section 1702 of title 50 without regard to section 1701 of title 50, or section 1263 of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (subtitle F of title XII of Public Law 114–328; 22 U.S.C ... 1 U.S. Code § 113 - “Little and Brown’s” edition of laws ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/113 1 U.S. Code § 113 - “Little and Brown’s” edition of laws and treaties; slip laws; Treaties and Other International Acts Series; admissibility in evidence. The edition of the laws and treaties of the United States, published by Little and Brown, and the publications in slip or pamphlet form of the 'The US has no obligation': Biden fought to keep ... https://tartanmarine.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-us... Jul 05, 2019 · As a senator, the future vice president, now 76, was adamant that the U.S. had "no obligation, moral or otherwise, to evacuate foreign nationals," dismissing concerns for their safety as the North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong swept south toward Saigon in 1975. 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983 Effective Date of 1979 Amendment. Amendment by Pub. L. 96–170 applicable with respect to any deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws occurring after Dec. 29, 1979, see section 3 of Pub. L. 96–170, set out as a note under section 1343 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volume ... https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1961-63v02/d108 Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volume II, Vietnam, 1962 108. Letter From the Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional Relations (Dutton) to the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (Fulbright) 1 Washington, March 14, 1962. [USC02] 28 USC Ch. 171: TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part6... 22 U.S. Code § 2151 - Congressional findings and ... https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/2151 (a) United States development cooperation policy. The Congress finds that fundamental political, economic, and technological changes have resulted in the interdependence of nations. COMPLAINT PAGE OF [JDC TEMPLATE – Rev. 05/2017] 31