Dear Attorney General Hon. William P. Barr

Dear Attorney General Hon. William P. Barr: I could tell about Vietnamese American arts

Dear
Senator Sir,

I am
forever oath loyalty with you, your party, and our Government of the United States of America
in order to donate forever- However, this time I have been spending so much of
money for my civil Settlement case for ten years ago.

Now I
would like to submit my case to you before I will be Proposal for the right
enforcement of the United States Constitution and law to the chairman of
justice Congress and House, and the United States Speaker Nancy.

Because
my case has been petitioning for more than ten years ago- Now is memory of 45
years of the Vietnam war were done - therefore, I do need to the duty and
responsibility of our Government of the United States of America that ought
to rightly enforce. that bases on Federal Claims Act House.Gov and within 28
U.S.C§ 1346; June 25, 1948- United States as defendant.

Therefore,
my Civil Settlement case bases on 28 U.S.C§ 2673- Report to Congress June 25,
1948 within 28 U.S.C§ 1346b June 25, 1948. So my petition would like to request
you to sponsor.

Dear
Attorney General Hon. William P. Barr Sir,

I
would like to submit my opinion of my Civil Settlement case to you because I do
think you should be the best Attorney General US than ex Attorney General Jeff
Session . Because the Jeff Session was throwing my Civil Settlement to the
United States garbage-history, I do think you to be good more than ex Jeff
Session-because the Jeff Session who did not understand about to Former
Attorney General Robert Kennedy when he visited to Republic of Vietnam and said,
“ Vietnam war must win communism. Therefore, I borrow this website page when I
would like to submit my Civil Settlement case to you.

According
to the United States Constitution and laws, which are ordering for the 22 U.S. Code §1622
a- U.S. Code that within Title 22. Transfer for Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission of the United
States to Department of Justice…

Therefore,
I do proving for this Title 22:

22
U.S.C§. 1622b Transfer of functions …

22.U.S.C§.
1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…

22.U.S.C§.
1662d- Appointment and compensation..

22.U.S.C
1622 e Vesting of all non-adjudicatory..

22.
U.S.C§ 1622 f Foreign Relations and intercourse …

22.
U.S.C§1622 g Independence
of Foreign Claims Settlement..

I do
base on this Title 22, I would like to explain for submitting my case to you
let you understand about my Civil Settlement case.

In
fact, he, Bright Quang, is representing for Ex- Republic of Vietnam because I
did not only service man( Ex-Lieutenant Police of Republic of Vietnam but also
Imprisoned by the masterminds of the Vietnam War of the Government of the
United States of America when they have self been confessing for wrongful
actions in the Vietnam War- Therefore, I have finding out to 28 U.S.C§ 1346;
June 25, 1948- United States as defendant — Title 28. Judiciary and Judicial
Procedure & 2346! find law.

In
condition, I was appointment in Department of Justice for few years already
when the Solicitor General of United States did not only send its letter to me
but also confirmed by its notes ( Please see attachment in my case): According
to the Vietnam War, you (Bright Quang) should follow with: The Solicitor
General determines the case in which Supreme Court Review will be sought by the
government and position the Government will take before the Court , the Office
of Solicitor adversely to the government in the lower courts to determine
whether they should be appealed and, if so, what position should be taken.

Ironically,
when I was gotten by your office Solicitor, I have been finding out to many
more lawyers from the center to the local government. However, the Bars
Assassination, American Laws, and Firm laws companies, they did not help for my
civil Settlement case. Since, American Law in New Your was signed agreement
with me in 2006, but after that, it was cancellation. Therefore, therefore, I
have self been studying laws for the ten years in order to clearly carry out
for the civil settlement case when I combined with the Law court in San Mateo,
which had been trained me to protect the United States Constitution and
respected the American laws or so-called is the American Justice.

In
case, I had been petitioning in the law court when it has ordered without
prejudice and gave orders, which is CiV: Confidential 532272.

Base-on,
I appeal to First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco , 350 Mcallister Street CA
94102, it this court
always created difficulties in order to return my document. Through, beside
Department of Motor Vehicles in Redwood City has put a mental case on my head
without have exalt reason because I had not violated traffic laws when I did
think that it has borrowing the police hand in order to murder me because I
have been petition for civil Settlement case of prisoner of war Imprisoned
benefit insurance because no prisoner of war of the world must be making
slavery war as like my case.

As a
result, the low courts did not determine to my case-therefore, I have
petitioning to Supreme Court of the United States and you when I do have to
following with 22 U.S.C United States as Dependent, 50 U.S.C§. 4105 Prisoner of
War-June 24, 1970 and 50 U.S.C§. 4101 Foreign Clams Settlement Commission of
the United States, July 3, 1948 ( Please sea my Table of contents) which is why
Supreme Court of the United States and your office’s Solicitor General are
distorting the American Justice- in fact, 22 U.S.C§ 1622b Title 22. Transfer of
foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of
Justice..22 U.S.C§ 1622c Membership of foreign Claims because Republic of Vietnam
was partnership with the United
States of America. 22 U.S.C§ 1622d
Appointment and Compensation that I have done by Solicitor General, 22 U.S.C
§1622e- Foreign Relations and Intercourse( see all the American statute of the
United States Congress has been enacted with Republic of Vietnam.)

That
‘s why the Solicitor General has distorted the American Justice because it has
not had ordered me to petition to High Court as United Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit and supreme Court- but, Supreme Court reviews and transfers my
petition to you or Solicitor general which is why your office distorts the
American Justice if you are unable to tackle, so you should be basing on 28
U.S.C§ 2673- Report to Congress June 25, 1948 within 28 U.S.C§ 1346b June 25,
1948 or so-called is Federal Claims Act. Perhaps, I’d like to carry out to the
right enforcement 28 U.S.C§ 2673 to Congressional is.

Respectfully
Yours

Bright
Quang

www.brightquang.net

Dear Attorney General Hon. William P. Barr

Dear Attorney General Hon. William P. Barr Sir,
I would like to submit my opinion of my Civil Settlement case to you because I do think you should be the best Attorney General US than ex Attorney General Jeff Session . Because the Jeff Session was throwing my Civil Settlement to the United States garbage-history, I do think you to be good more than ex Jeff Session- Therefore, I borrow this website page when I would like to submit my Civil Settlement case to you.
According to the United States Constitution and laws, which are ordering for the 22 U.S. Code 1622 a- U.S. Code that within Title 22. Transfer for Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of Justice…
Therefore, I do proving for this Title 22:
22 U.S.C. 1622b Transfer of functions …
22.U.S.C. 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…
22.U.S.C. 1662d- Appointment and compensation..
22.U.S.C 1622 e Vesting of all non-adjudicatory..
22. U.S.C 1622 f Foreign Relations and intercourse …
22. U.S.C.g Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement..
I do base on this Title 22, I would like to explain for submitting my case to you let you understand about my Civil Settlement case.
In fact, I, Bright Quang, is representing for Ex- Republic of Vietnam because I did not only service man( Ex-Lieutenant Police of Republic of Vietnam but also Imprisoned by the masterminds of the Vietnam Vietnam war of the Government of the United States of America when they have self been confessing for wrongful actions in the Vietnam War- Therefore, I have finding out to 28 U.S.C 1346; June 25, 1948- United States as dependent - Tittle 28. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure & 2346! find law.
In condition, I was appointment in Department of Justice for few years already when the Solicitor General of United States States did not only send its letter to me but also confirmed by its notes ( Please see attachment in my case): According to the Vietnam War, you (Bright Quang) should follow with: The Solicitor General determines the case in which Supreme Court Review will be sought by the government and position the Government will take before the Court , the Office of Solicitor adversely to the government in the lower courts to determine whether they should be appealed and, if so, what position should be taken.
Ironically, when I was gotten by your office Solicitor, I have been finding out to many more lawyers from the center to the local government. However, the Bars Assassination, American Laws, and Firm laws companies, they did not help for my civil Settlement case. Since, American Law in New Your was signed agreement with me in 2006, but after that, it was cancellation. Therefore, therefore, I have self been studying laws for the ten years in order to clearly carry out for the civil settlement case when I combined with the Law court in San Mateo, which had been trained me to protect the United States Constitution and respected the American laws or so-called is the American Justice.
In case, I had been petitioning in the law court when I has ordered without prejudice and gave orders, which is CiV: Confidential 532272.
Base-on, I appeal to First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco  , 350 Mcallister Street CA 94102, it this court always created difficulties in order to return my document. Through,  beside Department of Motor Vehicles in Redwood City has put a mental   case on my head without have exalt reason because I had not violated traffic laws when I did think that it has borrowing the police hand in order to murder me because I have been petition for civil Settlement case of prisoner of war Imprisoned benefit insurance because no prisoner of war of the world must be making slavery war as like my case.
As a result, the low courts did not determine to my case-therefore, I have petitioning to Supreme Court of the United States and you when I do have to following with  22 U.S.C United States as Dependent, 50 U.S.C. 4105 Prisoner of War-June 24, 1970 and 50 U.S.C. 4101 Foreign Clams Settlement Commission of the United States, July 3, 1948 ( Please sea my Table of contents) which is why Supreme Court of the United States and your office’s Solicitor General are distorting the American Justice- in fact, 22 U.S.C 1622b Tittle 22. Transfer of foreign Claims Settlement  Commission of the United States to Department of Justice..22 U.S.C 1622c Membership of foreign Claims because Republic of Vietnam was partnership with the United States of America. 22 U.S.C 1622d Appointment and Compensation that I have done by Solicitor General, 22 U.S.C 1622e- Foreign Relations and Intercourse( see all the American statute of the United States Congress has been enacted with Republic of Vietnam.)
That ‘s why the Solicitor General has distorted the American Justice because it has not had ordered me to petition to High Court as United Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and supreme Court- but, Supreme Court reviews and transfers my petition to you or Solicitor general which is why your office distorts the American Justice if you are unable to tackle, so you should be basing on 28 U.S.C 2673- Report to Congress June 25, 1948 within 28 U.S.C 1346b June 25, 1948   or so-called is Federal Claims Act. Perhaps, I’d like to carry out to the right enforcement 28 U.S.C 2673 to Congressional is.
Respectfully Yours
Bright Quang
www.brightquang.net

28 U.S. Code § 1651 - Writs

28 U.S. Code § 1651 - Writs: I could tell about Vietnamese American arts

 

Dear Attorney General Hon. William P. Barr Sir,

I
would like to submit my opinion of my Civil Settlement case to you
because I do think you should be the best Attorney General US than ex
Attorney General Jeff Session . Because the Jeff Session was throwing my
Civil Settlement to the United States garbage-history, I do think you
to be good more than ex Jeff Session- Therefore, I borrow this website
page when I would like to submit my Civil Settlement case to you.

According
to the United States Constitution and laws, which are ordering for the
22 U.S. Code 1622 a- U.S. Code that within Title 22. Transfer for
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department
of Justice…

Therefore, I do proving for this Title 22:

22 U.S.C. 1622b Transfer of functions …

22.U.S.C. 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…

22.U.S.C. 1662d- Appointment and compensation..

22.U.S.C 1622 e Vesting of all non-adjudicatory..

22. U.S.C 1622 f Foreign Relations and intercourse …

22. U.S.C.g Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement..

I
do base on this Title 22, I would like to explain for submitting my
case to you let you understand about my Civil Settlement case.

In
fact, I, Bright Quang, is representing for Ex- Republic of Vietnam
because I did not only service man( Ex-Lieutenant Police of Republic of
Vietnam but also Imprisoned by the masterminds of the Vietnam Vietnam
war of the Government of the United States of America when they have
self been confessing for wrongful actions in the Vietnam War- Therefore,
I have finding out to 28 U.S.C 1346; June 25, 1948- United States as
dependent - Tittle 28. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure & 2346! find
law.

In condition, I was appointment in Department of Justice for
few years already when the Solicitor General of United States States
did not only send its letter to me but also confirmed by its notes (
Please see attachment in my case): According to the Vietnam War, you
(Bright Quang) should follow with: The Solicitor General determines the
case in which Supreme Court Review will be sought by the government and
position the Government will take before the Court , the Office of
Solicitor adversely to the government in the lower courts to determine
whether they should be appealed and, if so, what position should be
taken.

Ironically, when I was gotten by your office Solicitor, I
have been finding out to many more lawyers from the center to the local
government. However, the Bars Assassination, American Laws, and Firm
laws companies, they did not help for my civil Settlement case. Since,
American Law in New Your was signed agreement with me in 2006, but after
that, it was cancellation. Therefore, therefore, I have self been
studying laws for the ten years in order to clearly carry out for the
civil settlement case when I combined with the Law court in San Mateo,
which had been trained me to protect the United States Constitution and
respected the American laws or so-called is the American Justice.

In
case, I had been petitioning in the law court when I has ordered
without prejudice and gave orders, which is CiV: Confidential 532272.

Base-on,
I appeal to First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco  , 350
Mcallister Street CA 94102, it this court always created difficulties in
order to return my document. Through,  beside Department of Motor
Vehicles in Redwood City has put a mental   case on my head without have
exalt reason because I had not violated traffic laws when I did think
that it has borrowing the police hand in order to murder me because I
have been petition for civil Settlement case of prisoner of war
Imprisoned benefit insurance because no prisoner of war of the world
must be making slavery war as like my case.

As a result, the low
courts did not determine to my case-therefore, I have petitioning to
Supreme Court of the United States and you when I do have to following
with  22 U.S.C United States as Dependent, 50 U.S.C. 4105 Prisoner of
War-June 24, 1970 and 50 U.S.C. 4101 Foreign Clams Settlement Commission
of the United States, July 3, 1948 ( Please sea my Table of contents)
which is why Supreme Court of the United States and your office’s
Solicitor General are distorting the American Justice- in fact, 22 U.S.C
1622b Tittle 22. Transfer of foreign Claims Settlement  Commission of
the United States to Department of Justice..22 U.S.C 1622c Membership of
foreign Claims because Republic of Vietnam was partnership with the
United States of America. 22 U.S.C 1622d Appointment and Compensation
that I have done by Solicitor General, 22 U.S.C 1622e- Foreign Relations
and Intercourse( see all the American statute of the United States
Congress has been enacted with Republic of Vietnam.)

That ‘s why
the Solicitor General has distorted the American Justice because it has
not had ordered me to petition to High Court as United Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit and supreme Court- but, Supreme Court reviews and
transfers my petition to you or Solicitor general which is why your
office distorts the American Justice if you are unable to tackle, so you
should be basing on 28 U.S.C 2673- Report to Congress June 25, 1948
within 28 U.S.C 1346b June 25, 1948   or so-called is Federal Claims
Act. Perhaps, I’d like to carry out to the right enforcement 28 U.S.C
2673 to Congressional is.

Respectfully Yours

Bright Quang

www.brightquang.net

28 U.S. Code § 1651 - Writs

28 U.S. Code § 1651 - Writs: I could tell about Vietnamese American arts

 https://medium.com/@quangbright/no-in-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-federal-first-circuit-1ca0750ea164?source=friends_link&sk=ec3c216e6898feadc4ec71badef97158

28 U.S. Code § 1651 - Writs

28 U.S. Code § 1651. Writs

• 
  
  U.S. Code
  
• 
  
  Notes
  
• 
  
  
  
  
• 
  
  Table of Popular Names
  
  

prev | next

(a)

The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress
may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective
jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.

(b)

An alternative writ or rule nisi may be issued by a justice or judge of a court which has jurisdiction.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 944; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 90, 63 Stat. 102.)

U.S. Code Toolbox

Law about... Articles from Wex

Table of Popular Names

Parallel Table of Authorities

How
current is this?

---

AddThis Sharing Buttons

Share to Email

Share to TwitterShare to Facebook141Share to LinkedInShare to More

35

---

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States: I could tell about Vietnamese American arts

The beautiful, the good, and the true of a Prisoner of War

Bright Quang

The
only Native Americans are authorized using First Amendment to the
United States Constitution, so the prisoner of conscience of the Vietnam
War of the United States of American could not touch to the United
States Constitution and Law. When the Native Americans have been carry
out the the United States Constitution, they request to President Trump
who does not walk on the the United States Constitution which is why,
the case of civil settlement of prisoner of conscience of the Vietnam
War, which was garbage by Attorney General Jeff Session. Ironically,
you, Native Americans, always praise for super Constitution and law of
the United States of America, but, you have never dare confront to the
trust of the United States Constitution. If you told me against to
Community Standards which is why, you did not dare ask for your
government that did not invade to any small nations as like Republic of
Vietnam. Since, the United States Congress enacted the statutory to
invade Republic of Vietnam and then, the American army seized all of the
South Vietnam. In contrast, the mastermind of the Vietnam War of the
Kissinger did not
only tear shred the Paris Peace Accords but also sold Republic of
Vietnam to communism. Now you wish to stop my mouth when I have been
carrying out the United States Constitution without have political
actions.How would you realize to Fixed mindset and young mindset? When I
realize to the Kissinger and says, " Erudition of the Kissinger is
limited, but ambitious barbarian of the Kissinger in unlimited."
Therefore, he does not only walk on the United States Constitution but
also distorted the American justice.

In
fact, the California Court has been trained me to protect the United
States Constitution and law for some years in the past. As a result, I
must carry out the US Constitution in order to protect the American
justice when I have never had against to community standards which is
why, you , community standards of the Native Americans, are
terror-stricken by
the beautiful, the good, and the true of a prisoner of war of the
Vietnam War of the United States of America. So, we should be webinars
this excerpts of my manuscript of the Art of Struggles. Because you have
never had prisoner of war at the Vietnamese communist hand and
therefore, you could not realize to the burden of sufferings of a man
who just lost his nation and imprisoned by the Western Heritage. The
legacy of my Orientalist is unmitigated punishment for of fenders. 

www.brightquang.com

• Politics

In the Supreme Court of the United States

No._____________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

______________________

January Term..............................2019
________________________________

Case No. CIV: 538988
Confidential Document: 532272

____________________
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
________________________________

BRIGHT QUANG
Petitioner
V.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent.
________________________

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORRARI TO
THE UNITED STATES OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
_______________________
Self Help: Bright Quang
217  5th Ave # 8
Redwood City, CA 94063
(TEL) 650-278-9542
(Email) bright_qng@yahoo.com


CAPITAL CASE

QUESTION/PRESENTED
I. How does he make a claim for Federal Tort Claims Act l House.gov for his lost fortune of investment, his Republic of Vietnam, and imprisoned benefits Insurance of the Vietnam War- whether his personal injuries, his father who was death without governments duties, which were not give any Death Certificate when Republic of Vietnam and the United States of America were partnerships each other.

II. What did his family and he grant for livelihood during they were left on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without regrets by Foreign Assistance Act of the United States of America in 1963, because of Socialism Republic of Vietnam did not have any international relations with the government of the US and Republic of Vietnam.

III. Would somehow can the defendant's statutory 28 U.S.C §  1346. June 25,1948 understand about to burden sufferings and unluckiness of the family plaintiff. During, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to should he do for defendant's US that's self confessed wrongful actions of his litigation.
IV. Whether the United States of America exactly expressed the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality by the United States Constitution, if not, the Justice of arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy was the United States of America of  the Vietnam War.








TABLE OF PARTIES

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA



























TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           page
QUESTIONS  / PRESENTED ..........................................................................i
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA........................................................... i
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................... vii

OPINIONS BELOW ................................................... .................................... 1
JURISDICTION .............................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 2
BACKGROUND................................................................................................2
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND........................................ 3
STATEMENT OF THE CASE................................................................1..to..70
APPENDIX............................................................................................71 to 707
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................iv to vii
S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE...............................................................3
9.11 PARTICULAR RIGHTS—FIRST AMENDMENT—"CITIZEN" PLAINTIFF 42 U.S.C.§1983..............................................................................4
22 U.S.C § 2451 - Pub. L 87-256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.................5
22 U.S.C.§7103.Pub.L.106–386,div. A,§105.Oct.28, 2000-114 Stat.1473.... ...6
22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 461.  ..7
18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103-322.........  ....7

10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 0,1956, ch.1041, 70A Stat. 153; Pub. L. 85–729.  .. 8

22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub 329-81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec.23,1950..-9
H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963..................................................... 9
H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88-205. Approved. December 16, 1963...........................11
22 USC§ 2151 Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4,1961....13
22 USC§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance
December. 20, 1975........................................................................................13
5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966.................................................14
18 U.S.C. § 227-Wrongfully influencing.Sep.14,2007...................................14
26 U.S.C. § 7701.Definition Aug.16,1954......................................................15
28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948..........................................15
21 USC§ 848- Oct. 27 1970.............................................................................16
1 USC§ 112a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950..................................18
1 USC§ 112-General Provision-July 30, 1947...............................................19
1 USC§ 112b. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972........20
37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6,1966............................................................................21
5 U.S.C. § 552a-December 31,1974.............................................................. 21
38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958......................................................22
38 U.S.C. §§ 1116-1311-Feb. 6, 1991-...........................................................23
1 U.S.C. § 113 -July 30,1947....................................................................... 24
22 U.S.C. § 7108. - Sep.22, 1961..................................................................24
35 U.S.C. §  183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982..............................26
Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983..........................................................28
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals.............................................28
Title VI CRA of 1964-42 U.S.C. § 2000D....................................................29
28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010...............................................30
18 U.S.C. §1705-- Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948........32
California Civil Code§§§ 44,45a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.........32
§46 Division.1. person [38-86].......................................................................32
42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference;
Aug. 14, 1935.................................................................................................34
17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998...........................................34
17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;
Oct. 19, 1976.................................................................................................34
42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990...........................39
CACI Nos. 3940-3949-DAMAGES-.............................................................42
CACI No.3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual..........................................44
28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948....................................................... 45
44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;
May 22, 1995...............................................................................................47
5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-...............................................48

S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ........................................51

50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;..................................52
50 U.S.C. §4101 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the
United States; July 3, 1948-......................................................................57
28 U.S.C. § 1346b-June 25, 1948-.............................................................58
28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;...........................................60
28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims;
June 25, 1948...........................................................................................59
28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948.............................61
28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948....................61
28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948.........................................63
Amendment XIV.......................................................................................63
22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code - Un-annotated Title 22. Transfer of
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
to Department of Justice.........................................................................63
22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions..............................................64
22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims...............................64
22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................65
22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory.....................................67
22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980.....67
22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement ...............67
18 U.S.C. § 2340A- Torture............................................................................68

28 U.S.C. § 357- Review of orders and actions. Nov.2, 2002. 116 Stat.1835.........................................................................................................66

Ted Kennedy and the KGB

Ted Kennedy and the KGB: Ted Kennedy and the KGB, A reflection on the late Democratic senator's outreach to the Kremlin to undermine President Reagan

No._____________________



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

______________________

January
Term..............................2019

________________________________

Case No. CIV: 538988

Confidential Document: 532272

____________________

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

________________________________



BRIGHT QUANG

Petitioner

V.



THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent.

________________________



PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORRARI TO

THE UNITED STATES OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT

FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

_______________________

Self Help: Bright Quang

217  5th Ave # 8

Redwood City, CA
94063

(TEL) 650-278-9542

(Email) bright_qng@yahoo.com





CAPITAL CASE



QUESTION/PRESENTED

I. How does he make a claim for Federal Tort Claims Act l House.gov for his
lost fortune of investment, his Republic of Vietnam, and imprisoned benefits
Insurance of the Vietnam War- whether his personal injuries, his father who was
death without governments duties, which were not give any Death Certificate
when Republic of Vietnam and the United States of America were partnerships
each other.



II. What did his family and he grant for livelihood during they were left on
the battlefield of the Vietnam War without regrets by Foreign Assistance Act of
the United States of America in 1963, because of Socialism Republic of Vietnam
did not have any international relations with the government of the US and
Republic of Vietnam.



III. Would somehow can the defendant's statutory 28 U.S.C §  1346. June
25,1948 understand about to burden sufferings and unluckiness of the family
plaintiff. During, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership
and to should he do for defendant's US that's self confessed wrongful
actions of his litigation.

IV. Whether the United States of America exactly expressed the righteousness,
the human rights, the ethics, and the equality by the United States
Constitution, if not, the Justice of arrogance of negligence of
undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy was the United States of America of
 the Vietnam War.

















TABLE OF PARTIES



THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA























































TABLE OF CONTENTS



                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                                                             
                                                                                                                                                                               page

QUESTIONS  / PRESENTED ..........................................................................i

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA...........................................................
i

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .........................................................................
vii

OPINIONS BELOW
................................................... ....................................
1

JURISDICTION ..............................................................................................
1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................
2

BACKGROUND................................................................................................2

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND........................................ 3

STATEMENT OF THE CASE................................................................1..to..70

APPENDIX............................................................................................71
to 707

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................iv
to vii

S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE...............................................................3

9.11 PARTICULAR RIGHTS—FIRST AMENDMENT—"CITIZEN" PLAINTIFF 42
U.S.C.§1983..............................................................................4

22 U.S.C § 2451 - Pub. L 87-256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75
Stat.527.................5

22 U.S.C.§7103.Pub.L.106–386,div. A,§105.Oct.28, 2000-114 Stat.1473.... ...6

22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75
Stat. 461.  ..7

18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103-322.........  ....7

10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 0,1956, ch.1041, 70A Stat.
153; Pub. L. 85–729.  .. 8

22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub 329-81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec.23,1950..-9

H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963.....................................................
9

H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88-205. Approved. December 16, 1963...........................11

22 USC§ 2151 Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102,
Sept.4,1961....13

22 USC§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance

December. 20, 1975........................................................................................13

5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966.................................................14

18 U.S.C. § 227-Wrongfully influencing.Sep.14,2007...................................14

26 U.S.C. § 7701.Definition Aug.16,1954......................................................15

28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948..........................................15

21 USC§ 848- Oct. 27 1970.............................................................................16

1 USC§ 112a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950..................................18

1 USC§ 112-General Provision-July 30, 1947...............................................19

1 USC§ 112b. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972........20

37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6,1966............................................................................21

5 U.S.C. § 552a-December 31,1974..............................................................
21

38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958......................................................22

38 U.S.C. §§ 1116-1311-Feb. 6, 1991-...........................................................23

1 U.S.C. § 113 -July 30,1947.......................................................................
24

22 U.S.C. § 7108. - Sep.22, 1961..................................................................24

35 U.S.C. §  183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982..............................26

Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983..........................................................28

42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals.............................................28

Title VI CRA of 1964-42 U.S.C. § 2000D....................................................29

28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010...............................................30

18 U.S.C. §1705-- Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948........32

California Civil Code§§§ 44,45a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.........32

§46 Division.1. person [38-86].......................................................................32

42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference;

Aug. 14, 1935.................................................................................................34

17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998...........................................34

17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;

Oct. 19, 1976.................................................................................................34

42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990...........................39

CACI Nos. 3940-3949-DAMAGES-.............................................................42

CACI No.3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual..........................................44

28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25,
1948....................................................... 45

44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;

May 22, 1995...............................................................................................47

5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-...............................................48



S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ........................................51



50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;..................................52

50 U.S.C. §4101 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the

United States; July 3, 1948-......................................................................57

28 U.S.C. § 1346b-June 25, 1948-.............................................................58

28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;...........................................60

28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims;

June 25, 1948...........................................................................................59

28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948.............................61

28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948....................61

28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948.........................................63

Amendment
XIV.......................................................................................63

22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code - Un-annotated Title 22. Transfer of

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States

to Department of Justice.........................................................................63

22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions..............................................64

22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims...............................64

22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................65

22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory.....................................67

22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980.....67

22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement ...............67

18 U.S.C. § 2340A- Torture............................................................................68

28 U.S.C. § 357- Review of orders and actions. Nov.2,
2002. 116
Stat.1835.........................................................................................................66

New/Current Job Opportunities at GSA Open to the Public (All U.S. Citizens)

New/Current Job Opportunities at GSA Open to the Public (All U.S. Citizens)

Education did not help for life, which looked like wild grass, says Bright Quang

www.brightquang.com

Restore American Glory » McConnell to Force Democrats to Vote for the Ridiculous Green New Deal

Restore American Glory » McConnell to Force Democrats to Vote for the Ridiculous Green New Deal

https://medium.com/@quangbright/proposal-for-enforcing-constitutional-and-law-69130e2b7cac

Redwood City, March..4...2019

From: Bright Quang

217
5th Ave # 8

Redwood
City, CA 94063

www.brightquang.com

email: bright_qng@yahoo.com

Telephone: (650) 278-9542

To: Federal Bureau of Investigation
Headquarters

935
Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington D.C 20535-0001

(202) 324-3000

PROPOSAL FOR
ENFORCING CONSTITUTIONAL AND LAW

To Whom It May Concern:

I would like to submit my statement of
the case of litigation's Civil Settlement of the prisoner of war of the Vietnam
war of the United States of America to you in order to enforce not only the
United States Constitution but also ought to carry out the exact American law,
because my refugee to the United States of America in November 22, 1993, which
is no corresponded with my prisoner of war's case which is why I have been
spending for more than tens years in order to petition to the Government of the
United States of America. Let me take the art of struggle for my prisoner of
war.

In case, I would like to  follow with the American law that I have
taken an oath loyalist for our United States Constitution to consider a full
proposal for my proposed start-up for Exactly.

Introduction

Exactly provides a
comprehensive best of a Vietnamese American citizen respecting the United
States Constitution and our super values of the American laws when my
meaningful prisoner of war of the Vietnam War is most lost by imprisoned
benefit insurance, real property, and small business but also  human dignity is entirely lost by a mental
case, which destroyed all of my intellectual property again. Premised on the
belief that substantive, petition American citizen can be powerful catalysts
for performing justice to pursuant Constitutional saying, "All Men are
created equal.{1}" Since it's saying, Distort justice as treason. Its
mission is to equip adequate of erudition laws in order to suitable citizen of
our super nation for following with formal principle of justice; and then, our
American citizens will not be violated American Constitution or to be criminals
along the spectrum of our justice has declared about Human Rights involvement's
Universal Declaration of human rights. The risk of our justice should seem for
able to destroy all of super values of our super nation when its best citizen
will be seemed neglected by your higher rank; and therefore, my exalt with an
honest, experiences and trust to take concrete steps towards becoming self-
reliant, self-fulfilled , and self- study law on petition for writ of
certiorari to the United States Court of appeals for the 50 U.SC§ 4105- Prisoner
of War -June 24, 1970 and 50 U.S.C§ 4101- Foreign Clams Settlement Commission of
the United States; July 3, 1948. In condition, the American law has had Federal
Tort Claims Act I House.gov because I have strongly been trained for protecting
and respecting Constitutional and the American law by the low court in the
state of California for some times in the past. Therefore, my statement case of
prisoner of war ought to carry out within our American Constitution and law that
my attachment would like to submit to you within in order to provide my best of
Vietnamese American citizen has highly following exact with American
Constitution and law.

Exactly, after many years of
petitioning for my human dignity of intellectual property in some low courts in
the state of California in order to recapture my honor, human dignity and a
treasure of arts and literature in which were lost by an hat of label mental
case is put on my head by Department of Motor Vehicles , but my right case was
denied by the low courts. These courts were prejudiced me by national origin
and under color skin - therefore, those always returned my document's case when
they did not carry out 5 U.S.
Code § 702 Right of review .Sep.6, 1966. The United
States may be named as a defendant in any such action,
and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United States: Provided, That any
mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer or officers
(by name or by title), and their successors in office,...

 Ironically, it seemed to borrow to the
police's hand in order to assassinate me by its mental case. Exactly I have no
had any mental case. When those put the mental ill on my head, those did not
only prohibited me find any jobs but also I did not dare appear in the public
and not dare relation with my neighbors because I always do worrying to the
public and my neighbors that they ought to call to police and then, the police
should kill me because the mental person always makes damage to everybody
because 42 U.S. Code § 12101. Findings and
purpose (a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1)

physical
or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person’s
right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with
physical or mental disabilities have been precluded from doing so because of
discrimination; others who have a record of a disability
or are regarded as having a disability
also have been subjected to discrimination;

(2)

historically,
society has tended to isolate and segregate individuals with disabilities, and,
despite some improvements, such forms of discrimination against individuals
with disabilities continue to be a serious and pervasive social
problem;

(3)

discrimination
against individuals with disabilities persists in such critical areas as
employment, housing, public accommodations, education, transportation,
communication, recreation, institutionalization, health services,
voting, and access to public services;

(4)

unlike
individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of race, color,
sex, national origin, religion, or age, individuals who have experienced
discrimination on the basis of disability
have often had no legal recourse to redress such discrimination;

(5)

individuals with disabilities
continually encounter various forms of discrimination, including outright
intentional exclusion, the discriminatory effects of architectural,
transportation, and communication barriers, overprotective rules and policies,
failure to make modifications to existing facilities and practices,
exclusionary qualification
standards and criteria, segregation, and relegation to lesser
services,
programs, activities,
benefits, jobs, or other opportunities;

(6)

census data, national polls, and other
studies have documented that people with disabilities, as a group, occupy an
inferior status in our society, and are severely disadvantaged socially,
vocationally, economically, and educationally;

(7)

the Nation’s proper goals regarding
individuals with disabilities are to assure equality of opportunity, full
participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for such
individuals; and

(8)

the continuing existence of unfair and
unnecessary discrimination and prejudice denies people with disabilities the
opportunity to compete on an equal basis and to pursue those opportunities for
which our free society is justifiably famous, and costs
the United States
billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and non productively.

(b) Purpose It is the purpose
of this chapter—

(1)

to provide a clear and comprehensive
national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with
disabilities;

(2)

to provide clear, strong, consistent,
enforceable standards addressing discrimination against individuals with
disabilities;

(3)

to ensure that the Federal Government
plays a central role in enforcing the standards established in this chapter on
behalf of individuals with disabilities; and

(4)

to invoke the sweep of congressional
authority, including the power to enforce the fourteenth amendment and to
regulate commerce,
in order to address the major areas of discrimination faced day-to-day by
people with disabilities.

(Pub. L. 101–336,
§ 2, July
26, 1990, 104 Stat. 328;
Pub. L.
110–325, § 3, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3554.)

In conclusion, the ten years I have respectfully been found
the American attorneys, Association Bars, and many Law firm companies in order
to need help, but, no of them ought to help for my Prisoner of war case.
Because they do think about my prisoner of war, which, should be touched to the
political action case. Therefore, they did not only discriminate me but also
prejudiced  my national origin and under
color skin when almost of the American lawyers have come from for many famous
college schools and to be famous International public lawyers, but they are
silent which is why I would like to proposal to you in order to enforce the
American Constitution and law in equality because unmitigated punishment for of
fenders. Obviously, the Congress finds that's 28 U.S.C. § 2678 - Attorney fees;
penalty

No attorney shall charge, demand, receive,
or collect for services rendered, fees in excess of 25 per centum of any
judgment rendered pursuant to section 1346 (b) of this title or any settlement made pursuant to
section 2677 of
this title, or in excess of 20 per centum of any award, compromise, or
settlement made pursuant to section 2672 of this title. Any attorney who charges,
demands, receives, or collects for services rendered in connection with such
claim any amount in excess of that allowed under this section, if recovery be
had, shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than one year,
or both.

Respectfully Yours

Bright Quang

___________________

¹ We hold these Truths to be
self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments
are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent ...

Terms to Know -
Center for Civic Education

www.civiced.org/resources/curriculum/911-and-the-constitution/terms-to-know

 https://medium.com/@quangbright/proposal-for-enforcing-constitutional-and-law-69130e2b7cac

What
does he somehow understand about to Rule of law or Rule by law of the
government of the United States of America because Distort justice is
national traitor?