THE STATEMENT CASE:
I. PROPOSAL DECISION
The
appellant appeals against the government employees that have been violated by
the US Constitution. Therefore, the appellant follows with Federal Tort Claims
Act in order to proposal decision from the Court.
II. OPINION
The
appellant thinks about the justice of a nation is expressed by rules of law,
constitutional rights, or rule by law. If the justice is distorted by the
obstructs of justice of totalitarianism, the justice of the super nation is
nothing.
III. INTRODUCTION
The
plaintiff- appellant, is asked for imprisoned benefit Insurance whether
granting for his services of the Vietnam War and to what somehow grant the
profits of the appellant's real property and small business which were lost by
the US cut and run out of the Republic of Vietnam on April 30, 1975- these are
of super values of democracy, freedom, justice and free economics when he'd like to claim for recapturing them
because he lives in a modern nation's rule of law. In fact, Ex- lieutenant
police of the Republic
of Vietnam United States of America County
of San Mateo
IV. BACKGROUND
The plaintiff- appellant,
he, was ex- Lieutenant Police of Republic of Vietnam, from 1973 to 1975, but he
was left on the battlefield in the South Vietnam by Foreign Assistance Act of
the government of the US or the so-called is the Paris Peace Accords, which was
signed in Jan.27, 1973 by the Secretary
of state of the US and four sides, which was belonged to International Treaty.
Until in all, the US cut and run out of the Republic of Vietnam in April 30,
1975 - and then, the US did not only donate the appellant to the Vietnamese
communist terrorism but also had all properties of the appellant, his family,
and him to communism. Whilst, Socialist Republic of Vietnam had never had
International relations with Republic
of Vietnam and the United States of America US brought him and his family to the US in November 23, 1993 by Bring Them Home Alive
Act, but, in the US Superior Court
of San Mateo
County Superior
Court of
San Mateo County Superior Court of San Mateo County Superior
Court of
San Mateo County
V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The defendant's US has been making injures,
destroys, wounded heart, and destroying real property and small business and
prisoner of war from 1963 to April 30, 1975 and to November 22, 1993 in the
Vietnam War of the US. Therefore, the plaintiff- appellant would like to base
on to this statutory: appellant
bases on the constitutional rights in order to prove to his case:
To
prove 22 U.S.C § 1621(a)(c) [1]-March 10, 1950 because the appellant who was
the term's person, allied partnership of the US when he and the defendant's US
were fighting against for the communist terrorism in the Republic of Vietnam in
the past by the US Congress enacted the statutory, which the so-called is
Foreign Assistance Act.
Therefore, this statutory was connecting
with Ex-lieutenant Police of Republic of Vietnam and the defendant's US when
the defendant's US and the appellant were fighting against for communism on the
battlefield of the South Vietnam, which foe did not only terrorize in the South
Vietnam but also threatened to the safety of the United States of America for
the long run. Significantly, the defendant's US
and the appellant were entirely enforcing law of the America Congress by the
Vietnam War of the US
However, the defendant's US was without main reason that it cut and run
out of Republic
of Vietnam
__________________
1.
(a) The term “person” shall include an individual, partnership, corporation,
or the Government of the United States.
(b)The term “United States” when used in a geographical
sense shall include the United States, its Territories and insular possessions, and the Canal Zone.
(c)The term “nationals of the United States”
includes (1) persons who are citizens of the United
States , and (2)
persons who, though not citizens of the United
States , owe permanent allegiance to the United States
The appellant's pursuant 1 U.S.C. § 112 a[2] Added Sept. 23, 1950 that US must be approved and carried
out all of the International Treaties and others Agreement of each nation as like the US
was approved the International treaty with Republic of Vietnam in the past. In
contrast, the defendant's US US US
____________________________
2. The Secretary of
State shall cause to be compiled, edited, indexed, and published, beginning as of January 1, 1950, a compilation
entitled “United States Treaties and Other International Agreements,” which shall contain all
treaties to which the United States is a party that have been proclaimed during each calendar year, and
all international agreements other than treaties to which the United States is a party
that have been signed, proclaimed, or with reference to which any other final formality has been executed,
during each calendar year. The said United States Treaties and Other International Agreements shall be
legal evidence of the treaties, international agreements
other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and
agreements, therein
contained, in all the courts of the United States, the several States, and the
Territories and insular possessions of
the United States.
(b)The Secretary of State may determine that publication of certain
categories of agreements is not required,
if the following criteria are met:
(1)
such agreements are
not treaties which have been brought into force for the United States after having received Senate advice and consent pursuant to section
2(2) of Article II of the Constitution
of the United States
In condition, the defendant's
US was approved 22 USC § § 1571-1604 [3] - December 23, 1950. In fact, the defendant's US did not
only acknowledged to self determination sovereign of the three countries that's
within Laos , Cambodia , and the Republic of Vietnam
As a result, the defendant's US was far living from a half and Circling Earth, but, therefore, the
defendant's US was coming to help for Republic of Vietnam
Perhaps, those times of the
defendant's US seems was needing for a large battlefields- and in the meanwhile,
the defendant's US could not yet brainwash all of three people in
Southeast-Asia, so the defendant's was quickly signed this International Treaty
but also approved by the US Congress, but, in the end looked like the Paris
Peace Accords because of the defendant's has quotes, "America has no
permanent friends or enemies, only interests."
Obviously, the defendant's US
has never respected others interests when the defendant's US was selfish in
one's self which is why the ethics of the defendant's US always praises.
Therefore, the defendant's US
did not only betray Republic
of Vietnam
________________________
3. Mutual Defense Assistance in Indochina of December 23, 1950 ( TIAS 2447; 3 UST 2756) which
was included pursuant to P.L 329-81 ST Congress. 63 Stat-74- 22 USC § § 1571-1604
https://
history.state.gove/historicaldocuments/frus 1961-63v02/d108714, 22 USC.
1751-1604
The appellant is right to
carry out to this statutory 42 USC § 1981 [4] Nov. 21, 1991. in order to protect and to highly
respect the US Constitution when he is powerless appellant to hire any
attorneys to help for his case because the justice is without everyone who will
obstruct of the justice and without abuse of the justice. Even good, he does
believe the justice more than everything in his life. If therefore distorts
justice is national treason . For example, the appellant was violated the
red-light of traffic law when he came to the court was judged to pay $250.00
because the law is the law in all. That is why, the defendant's US US
In prove, 1 USC § 112 b [5] -Aug. 22, 1972, in which expressed,
transmitted the text of any International Agreements to the US Congress by Secretary of State, or
oral of the International Agreement to reduce the writing, which is before
within six months, and, within opinion's president which is why the Paris Peace
Accords, which was promised by president, but it was arrogantly torn by the
defendant's US when it solemnly declared, " No one will leave
behind."
___________________
4. All persons within the
jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full
and equal benefit of all laws and
proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject
to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to
no other
5. A bilateral
agreement with a country that is subject to a determination under section
6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Administration
Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)(A)),[1] section 620A(a)
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)),
or section 40(d) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)).
No
peace, No honor,.. and betrayal in Vietnam
Lets
appellant be pursuant by 1 USC§ 113 [6] - July 30, 1947, which has was expressed by
the US Constitution , but, which is why the Paris Peace Accords was without
enforced law, since, the Paris Peace Accords was as important as an
International Treaty of the whole world that not only have the defendant's US
signed but also more Great Powers endorsed it. If the Paris Peace Accords was
not arrogantly torn by the Defendant's US
On the other hand, the US Congress
had been enacting for this Foreign Assistance Act of 1963, in which was to be
H.R 5490 [7], on April 23,24,25 and 29 of 1963 that would prove to the best of
hearts of the American people. And then, the defendant's US must availably help
for the backward of the Southern people that fight-against to communist
terrorism which is why the defendant's US did not only destroy it but also
betrayed Republic of Vietnam that have democracy, Justice and freedom to look
like the defendant's US policy.
____________________
6.
The edition of the laws and treaties of the United States, published by Little
and Brown, and the publications
in slip or pamphlet form of the laws of the United States issued under the
authority of the Archivist of the
United States, and the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary
of State shall be competent evidence of the several public and private Acts of Congress, and of the
treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such
treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all
the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public
offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.
7. US Senator has had a question 3- even so good a
friend of Vietnam as US
To base on
H.R. 7885 [8] that's statutory involves to the appellant's life- Even for good,
the defendant's US is as important as
partnership and corporate controls of both governments because public law
88-205- December 16, 1963 or the so-called is H.R 7885- Section 406 & 407
has spoken that No department, agency,
officer, or employee of the US shall, under authority of this act, exercise any
direction, supervision , or control over, or impose any requirements or
conditions which respect to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction,
or administrations of any educational institution. Approved. December 16, 1963,
11: am. Or repealed 22 USC § 2151 75 Stat. 424. Approved Dec. 16,1963
Lets appellant
prove that the defendant's US had been supported expansion Assistance, or
so-called is Development loan fund and Military Assistance in order
to persuade the Government of South Vietnam that should be victory communism
and then the US will return homeland, But not sell the South Vietnam to communism, no betrayed each
other, and no built chaotic of South Vietnam because this statute's H.R. 7885
and section406 - 407 of the US has confirmed this, " It is the
sense of the congress that assistance authorized by this act should be extended
to or withheld from the government of South Vietnam, in the discretion of the
president, to further the objectives of victory in the war again communism and
return to their homeland of the Americans involves in that struggle." Significantly, appellant would like to be proud of life welcoming
to the American government when it does not only send the US citizens to Vietnam
but also supported the many financial aids to Vietnam South Vietnam Vietnam to freedom,
democracy, and justice, but, ironically, the defendant's US could not defeat communism out of the South Vietnam , but, the defendant's US sold off Republic of Vietnam
_______________
8.The US Congress has orders to all of agencies should enforce law
and small business of the
appellant were sold off by the defendant's US
According to 1 USC § 2151(a) (b) [9] -Sep. 4, 1961 that
congressional findings and declaration
policy that's very perfect one for the all of international nations. That is
why, the defendant's US was
wrongful enforcing law to Republic
of Vietnam Republic
of Vietnam
___________________
9 The Congress finds that
fundamental political, economic, and technological changes have resulted in he interdependence of nations.
The Congress declares that the individual liberties,
economic prosperity, and security of the
people of the States are best sustained and
enhanced immunity of nations which
respect individual civil and economic rights and freedoms and which cork together
to use wisely the world’s limited resources in an open and ` suitable international economic
system. Furthermore, the Congress reaffirms the traditional humanitarian ideals of the American people and renews its
commitment to assist people n developing countries to eliminate Unger, poverty, illness, and
ignorance. Therefore, the congress
declares that a principal objective f
the foreign policy of the United States is the encouragement and sustained
support of the people f developing countries in their efforts
to acquire the knowledge and
resources essential to envelopment
and to build the economic, political,
and social institutions which will improve the quality
of their lives. United
States
According to 1 USC§112 [10]. July ,30,1947 that
the appellant would like to point out three American President who are to be
the defendants of the Republic of Vietnam- Even better Federal Tort Claims
Act which is why the appellant compares
Federal Tort Claims Act with statutory 1 USC§112
- for that's reason, Federal Tort Claims Act is belonged to all of agencies, in
which the employers who were wrongful performed by the US Constitution- and
therefore, the law is called by Federal Tort Claims Act. However, the American
Presidents were wrongful carried out the Vietnam War by the US Constitution -
to somehow called for exact legal case? In case, there is no rule without an
exception, but it's legal. Because of the exact evidences of the American
presidents were self confessed war crime in one's self by their spoken in
recorded when they were doing in archives. Therefore, when the American President was speaking out
in one's self, his evidences were the same as law. Because the exact evidences
of the mastermind of the Vietnam War of the US
________________________
10. The
Archivist of the United States shall cause to be compiled, edited, indexed, and
published, the United States Statutes at
Large, which shall contain all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during each regular session of
Congress; all proclamations by the President in the numbered series issued since the date of the adjournment of
the regular session of Congress next preceding;
and also any amendments to the Constitution of the United States proposed or
ratified pursuant to article V thereof
since that date, together with the certificate of the Archivist of the United States issued in compliance with
the provision contained in section 106b of this title. In the event
of an extra session of Congress, the Archivist of the United States
To prove 22 USC § 2151 n(a)(b) [11]. December
20, 1975, the defendant's US
has been taking care in concern to human Rights, including torture or cruel,
inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment which is why the performance of
defendant's US Republic of Vietnam US
was thankful to appellant that's accepted so much of inhuman gift of the
defendant's US, which were imprisoned, wounded, lost properties, and sorrowful
life by the Vietnam War of the defendant's US
___________________________
11. No assistance may be provided
under subchapter I of this chapter to the government of any country which engages in a consistent pattern
of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights, including torture or cruel, inhuman, or
degrading treatment or punishment, prolonged
detention without charges, causing the disappearance of persons by the abduction and clandestine detention of those persons, or other flagrant denial of the right to life,
liberty, and the security of person, unless such assistance will directly benefit the needy
people in such country.
(b) [1] Information
to Congressional committees for realization of assistance for needy people; concurrent resolution
terminating assistance
In determining
whether this standard is being ...
the appellant points out this
statutory S. 484- [12] Public Law 106-484 Congress- Bring them Home Alive which
is why the defendant's US has exchanged prisoners of war to refugees program.
Lets the defendant's US run for the duty and responsibility of the Vietnam War.
Even good, the defendant's US was not used by prisoner of war, but, the
defendant's US did not only dare recognize to the appellant's prisoner of war
in order to fool his imprisoned benefits Insurance but also trampled down his
human dignity in order to exploit labor of a prisoner again. In fact, the
appellant must pay for airplane tickets, which were all of his family, but,
when International organization was
donated $2,000.00 to his appellant, so the local government was subtracted by his income. In contrast, refugees program was
used by normal citizens who were oppressed by the communist terrorist. During,
the statutory was recognized by POW/MIAS. So, the defendant's US was deceived
the appellant by great powerful America US Vietnam was taken place in Republic
of Vietnam by the US policy in order to deceive the Vietnamese
people because the US was
modern society's trillion-fold of the Republic of Vietnam US US
________________________
12. A
bill to provide for the granting of refugee status in the United States to
nationals of certain foreign countries
in which American Vietnam War POW/MIAs or American Korean War POW/MIAs may be present, if
those nationals assist in the return to the United States of those POW/MIAs alive.
certificate
of Dismissal from camp # 293 GRT-25807806142 by Socialist Republic of Vietnam and his Ex lieutenant police of Republic of Vietnam
To persuasive statutory 9. 11particular Rights First
Amendment-" Citizen" plaintiff "- 42 USC § 1981 [13] up to that time,
the appellant has the burden of proving that acts of the defendant's US deprived
the appellant of the particular rights under the US Constitution. In this case,
the appellant claims the defendant's US US
To persuasive is First Amendment to the Constitution
[14]. perfect for a good a Vietnamese American citizen who is the appellant and
therefore, he does need to the US Constitutional law, in which protects him
when his life does bases on to the Constructional rights because he has been
trained to study the US Constitution law- surely, by the Court of San Mateo
County in the past. Therefore, the cornerstone of legal is First Amendment of
the appellant's life let him struggle for the America America
_______________________
13.
Under the First Amendment, a citizen has the right [to free expression] [to
petition the government]
[to access the courts] [other applicable right]. In order to prove the
defendant deprived the
plaintiff of this First Amendment right, the plaintiff must prove the following
additional elements by a preponderance
of the evidence:
14. Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of
the press; or the right of the people peaceably
to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The pursuant 22 USC § 1431 [15] Congress
declaration of objectives. Sep.21,1961. Even great for the America US US and
Ex-republic of Vietnam Republic of Vietnam South
Vietnam South Vietnam America
was: " On one tape recorded November 4, 1963, President dictates a memo
seeming to regret the assassination of South Vietnam 's
President's Vietnam Quang Ngai , Vietnam Son
Loc Village America war
transferred to Vietnam US US US US
____________________
15. The Congress declares that the objectives of this
chapter are to enable the Government of the United States to promote a better understanding of the United States in other countries, ...
15b.
Vietnam War: the Early Years, 1965-1967- Https://rarehistorycalphotos.com/ Vietnam
Repealed. Public law
87-256, §111(a) (2), September 21, 1961, 75 Stat 538. Easily increasing
sent the UA Army to the South
Vietnam US
To prove 22 USC § 2451 [16]- Congressional statement of purpose - Public law 87- 356, §
101. Set. 21, 1961. 75 Stat. 527) if the Vietnam War of the defendant's US
performed this statutory, so, the appellant did not only appreciate the
Government of the US but also have backward Vietnamese people have had trillion
fold to thank to the US. That's why, the defendant's US US
increases mutual education and culture each other, but the US US US did not sell republic of Vietnam
to communism, the defendant's US US
______________
16.
The purpose of this chapter is to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries by means of educational and cultural
exchange;
17. My-Lai Massacre and Courts- Martial
for the Account
To prove S. 2040, [18] JUSTICE AGAINST SPONSORS OF
TERRORISM ACT - According to this act is objective justice because the present
is modern Age. When sea-robber or dictators were of abuse one's power that they
destroyed to the peaceful life of the innocent people. Significantly, the
defendant's US Iran US
______________________________
18.
On
Wednesday, September 28, 2016, the House will consider overriding the
presidential veto of S. 2040, the
Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, under suspension of the rules. S.
2040 was
introduced on September 16, 2015, by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)
US
judge: Iran must pay $6bn to
victims of 9/11 attacks Lawsuit alleges Iran
According to this statutory 22
U.S.C.§ 2403 [a] [19]. Sep. 4,1961 that the appellant bases on this- lets him
take all of agency's evidences of the Government of the US to demonstrate to his prisoner of war of the
Vietnam War case because the prisoner of war of the Vietnam
To follow 37 USC§ 552 [20]. Sep. 6,
1966, in which the defendant's US
should all pay the imprisoned benefits insurance to the appellant- since, he
was missing the Vietnam War for the long time because the duty and
responsibility of the defendant's US
______________________
19.
Agency
of the United States Government”
includes any agency, department, board, wholly or partly owned corporation, instrumentality,
commission, or establishment of the United States Government.
20. A member of a uniformed service who is on active duty or performing inactive-duty training, and who is in a missing status, is—
(1) for the period
he is in that status, entitled to receive or have credited to his account the same pay and
allowances, as defined in this chapter, to which he was entitled at
the beginning of that period or may thereafter become entitled; and
(2)for the period,
not to exceed one year, required for his hospitalization and rehabilitation
after termination of that status, under
regulations prescribed by the Secretaries concerned, with ...
did not carry out this Article 1? As the appellant
has said, "The justice of a super nation is expressed by its constitution.
If it does not carry out perfectly, it is arrogant."
The
pursuant is 38 USC § 1311 [21] dependency and indemnity compensation
to a surviving spouse- Sep. 2, 1958, in which the children and the wife of the
appellant should follow with this bill because their life is belonged to the
appellant.
VI. DISCUSION
Lets the
plaintiff- appellant would like to argue with the defendant's US United States of America
__________________
21.
Dependency and indemnity compensation shall
be paid to a surviving spouse at the monthly rate
of $1,154.
the defendant's US US Vietnam
To prove 50 USC§
4015 (b) [22] Prisoners of War - July 3, 1948 that the appellant should be
adequately earning the prisoner of war without denied because the mastermind of
the Vietnam War is belonged to the defendant's US which is why the defendant's
US did not enforce law of the prisoner of war of the appellant. Even for great,
the defendant's US has taken
advantage of the backward people when the defendant's US Vietnam
when the appellant came to the US
__________________
22. The Commission is authorized to receive, adjudicate according
to law, and provide for the payment of
any claim filed by any prisoner of war for compensation for the
violation by the enemy
government by which he was held as
a prisoner of war, or its agents, of its
obligation to furnish him the quantity or
quality of food to which he was entitled as a prisoner of war under the
terms of the Geneva Convention
of July 27, 1929. The compensation allowed to any prisoner of war under the provisions of this subsection shall be at the
rate of $1 for each day
he was held as a prisoner of war on which the enemy government or its agents
failed to furnish him such quantity or
quality of food. Any claim allowed under the provisions of this subsection
shall be certified to ....
The
pursuant to 50 USC§ 4101 [23]- Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the US
In prove
28 USC§ 1346 [24]-United
States US- US because the bad event of the Vietnam War was
very clear in law when the mastermind of the Vietnam War of the defendant's US
__________________
23. The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United
States (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”) may, in accordance
with the provisions of the civil-service laws and chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, appoint and fix the compensation of such
officers, attorneys,
and employees, and may make such
expenditures, as may be necessary to carry out its
functions. Officers and employees of any
other department or agency of the Government may, with the consent of the head of
such department or agency, be assigned to assist the Commission in
carrying out its functions. The Commission may,
with the consent of the head of any other department
or agency of the Government, utilize the facilities
and services of such
department or agency in carrying out the functions of the Commission.
24. Any civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed
or collected, or any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority or any sum alleged to have been
excessive or in any manner wrongfully
collected under the internal-revenue laws;
To especially
prove again 28 USC § 1346 [24], in which has proved to " Only the United States United
States United States
when statutory "28 USC § 1346" is
belonged directly to the American Government or the defendant's US
In fact, the American Government is sovereign immunity
and authorized claimed by the appellant. the provisions of the FTCA are found
in Title 28 of the US Code. 28 USC § 1346 (b)
[25], in which are pointed out the wrongful actions of agency. In condition,
these provisions were self evident by agency. Since 56th Secretary of state who
was self confessed wrongful actions by oneself, it has quotes,"3.
Bombing Vietnam
_____________________
24. The FTCA constitutes a limited waiver of sovereign immunity, permitting
citizens to pursue one tort claims
against the government.
25. As printed in
this report, this chapter should have read "173" and not
"171". It was properly numbered
"173" in the bill. However, the chapter was renumbered
"171", without change in its action
numbers, by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
and "7.Assassination:
"It is an act of insanity and national humiliation to have a law
prohibiting the President from ordering assassination." (Statement at
national Security Council meeting. 1975.) What did human rights of the defendant's US perform?
To prove the
top 10 Most inhuman 56 th. secretary of
state quotes, the mastermind of the Vietnam War was self confessed the wrongful
actions by one's self. because of, the appellant has been terrorized for more
than twenty years of the Vietnam War by the defendant's US
§2671 definitions.
§2672
administrative adjustment of claims.
§2673
reports to congress
§2674
Liability of the United
States
§2675 Disposition by federal agency as
prerequisite; evidence
§2676
Judgment as bar
§2677
compromise
§2679 Exclusiveness
of remedy.
§2680
Exception
The pursuant §2671 definitions, in which is to follow with
foreign Assistance Act of 1963 by the Defendant's US
§672. administrative adjustment of claims, in which
the appellant does follow by U.S. Department of Justice-Office of the Solicitor
general.
__________________
26. U.S. Department of
Justice-Office of the Solicitor general has allowing the appellant claims to the government of the US
§2673-
Reports to Congress, in which's accordingly to the Vietnam War of the US
Congress has enacting statutory- and therefore, the US Congress did not only
understand about the statutory but also approved in all of statutory of foreign
Assistance Act to the Vietnam War. therefore, self evident reports to
Congressional must carry out.
§2674
[27] liability of the United States, in which liability of the US should be
compensated for the Vietnam War because the defendant's US did not only control
Vietnam War but also masterminded to sell Republic of Vietnam to communist
terrorism
Therefore, all of real property,
small business, and prisoner of war of the appellant must compensate by the
defendant's US
§2675 - Disposition by federal
agency as prerequisite; evidence, which is firmly in claim because when the
appellant has deciding for a claim, he must have exact evidences.
§2676- Judgment as bar, in which
the appellant was discriminated by national origins under color. During, the
appellant has been sought judgment as bar, but no bar helped for him.
§2677
[28] Compromise, in which the appellant would like to compromise with
defendant's US if it compensated the all of injuries to him. Because his real
property and his small business were true, his prisoners of war was corrected by
the US Constitution.
That's why, the
Appellant sues the defendant's US because it went to against to the US
Constitution in the Vietnam US and Republic of Vietnam
____________________
27.
the My_Lai Massacre and Court Material & Vietnam War: the Early Years
1965-1976
28.
Ngu Huyen's small business by Republic
of Vietnam
in all of the
appellant's properties without compensation - in fact, when the American people
have been happiness in modern society for the long run, but the children and
the wife of the appellant were burdened of sufferings, miserable, and sorrowing
life by the US War of the Vietnam War.
§2679
[a] the appellant does not display any own names of Federal Tort Claims Act. In
contrast, all men are equal, but the own names of FTCA were displayed by the
case. What can the appellant do for exact evidences when the American president
who self confessed in the Vietnam War?
§2680-
Exceptions [29] June 25, 1948, in which is very pointing of fact's evidences
because the mastermind of the Vietnam War of the Government of the US was
enacted by the US Congress-however, the Vietnam War of the US did not only
betray Republic of Vietnam but also did not enforce any the US laws. As a
result, the totalitarianism is ruled by the US
Chapter 11: Civil Rights: [30] the
Constitution is designed to guarantee basic civil rights to everyone. The
meaning of civil rights has changed overtime. That the appellant
___________________
29. Self evident of the Paris Peace Accords was torn by
the defendant's US
.the two South Vietnamese
parties undertake to respect the cease-fire and maintain peace in South Vietnam ,
settle all matters of contention through negotiations , and avoid all armed
conflict which is why the
defendant's US has supported
to Socialist Republic of Vietnam when the defendant's US
30. the appellant would like to
carry out Civil rights designed by the US Congress. Let him protect his civil case when the defendant' US seems to
drop the US Constitution, it uses for Jungle law.
would like to
prove to this civil rights. Therefore, the appellant does prove this in order
to protect his civil rights case. In fact, the appellant did not only discriminate
national origins under color but also maltreated prisoner of war- During, the
US Congress has enacted statutory for Prisoners of War which is why the
appellant who didn't apply to this statutory for war and any benefits. Perhaps,
the defendant's US
Civil Rights Section 1: Civil rights &
Discrimination [31] The appellant's civil rights was discriminated by the
defendant's US. In fact, the 43rd president who was humiliation the appellant
and his Southern people again. For that's reason, after the thirty years of the
Defendant's US had been occupied Republic of Vietnam and used the Paris Peace
Accords to sell off Republic of Vietnam to the communist terrorism, but the
defendant's US did not only compensate any pennies of the war victim but also
sold the Republic of Vietnam and the
appellant's real properties to communism, but the prisoners of war didn't give him to apply benefits. So he has never
earned a little bit of prisoner of war
when the defendant's US America Justice in order to protect his civil
rights because the US Army was coming to the Republic
of Vietnam , it did not enforce any the
US laws, but it was
undisciplined -soldiers in the Republic
of Vietnam Republic of Vietnam when they did not only respect the South
leaders but also donated their life to Republic of Vietnam Republic
of Vietnam , it pushed them to the foe
of the Republic of Vietnam and the defendant's US
In fact, Ex-
republic of Vietnam and the defendant's US were partnership each other without
animosity , but, which is why the defendant's US did not only betray the
________________
31.
Public September 28, 2004- Fox news Face book Twitter Email (Repealed)
32. The My Lai Massacre and Court
Martial and Account {repealed}
Republic of
Vietnam and the appellant, but also sold in all of the land of ancestors and
the Republic of Vietnam Army to communist terrorism when it did not have
International Relations with the Defendant's US and Republic of Vietnam in
order to against to the US Constitution.
The pursuant 22 USC§ 1622 g [33]. march 14, 1980,
in which the appellant is allowed by this statutory in order to claim
imprisoned benefits insurance of prisoners of war when he does requesting the
defendant's US that should be compensated to Ex-republic of Vietnam- Her was
betrayed by the defendant's US because Republic of Vietnam was approved by the
US Congress when Socialist Republic of Vietnam was not acknowledged by the US
Congress because it did not only hate but also threatened to the US , but ,
which is the defendant's US has left partnership when the defendant's US was
torn the US Constitution in order to make international relations with the foe.
To prove 44 USC § 3507 [34]. May 22, 1995 which is why
the appellant carries out this. In fact, the appellant did not only betray the
Vietnam War but also exploited labor to bone and marrow when he lives in the US US US
_________________
33. Nothing in this Act
shall be construed to diminish the independence of the Commission in making its determinations on claims in
programs that it is authorized to administer pursuant to the powers and responsibilities conferred upon
the Commission by the War
Claims Act of 1948, as amended
[50 U.S.C.
4101 et seq.], the International
Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended [22 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.]
34. An agency shall not conduct
or sponsor the collection of information unless in advance of the adoption or revision of the collection of information—
of retirement. For
that's reason, the appellant did not only exploit war but also made modern
slavery war in his second mother of American. When the American people have
been developing for their modern Age, they do not suffer any wars. In fact, the
Vietnam War had been hired the Vietnamese men by the foreign Assistance Act of 1963. If the
defendant's US did not
sponsor to Vietnam War, the defendant's US US was coming to
Republic of Vietnam
in order to build up the war, the defendant's US
did not respect any ethics, human rights, and equality of Republic of Vietnam
The pursuant to 5 USC § 5370 [35]. Nov. 4, 1990,
which is very good program to help for many poor students who were unable to
pay the school fees because education of
a person looks like the sun, which spreads everywhere. if the person had no
educated, his life looked a lamp, in which is without old. In case, the
appellant's properties were sold to communism by the defendant's US- and then, the defendant's US has had earned the best of national interests
from the Republic
of Vietnam- US California US
___________________
35. (A)the
term “agency” means an agency under subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of section 4101(1) of this title, the
Architect of the Capitol, the Botanic Garden, and the Office of Congressional Accessibility Services;
and
(B)the term
“student loan” means—
(i)
a loan made, insured, or guaranteed under part B of title IV of the
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
1071 et seq.
The pursuant 28
USC§ 1827 [36]-
Interpreter in Court of the United
States South Vietnam US and the Republic of Vietnam
Q. Have you lieutenant Police of puppet Saigon
government had?
A. Yes, I have
Q. May you tell us to know about Department of Police
System in Saigon , may not you?
A. No, May think sir.
Because the American government has donated the South Vietnam
The foe of communist terrorism was quickly beaten on the
head of the appellant by A.K 47 gun - and then, some of communist terrorism
were quickly said, " You are headstrong puppet police because the
revolution has won the Great America- in the meanwhile, his left ear is bleeding-
so, they are covered his head by a ballast when they draw him to special jail
in order to no inmate seeing him. that's why, the appellant who was to be enemy
of the defendant's US when he was tortured by the foe of the defendant's US
__________________
36. Audiogram by San Mateo-
Medical Center
To prove 18 USC § 2340 A [37] April 30, 1994- that's
why the defendant's US did not only send so may of the US Armies to Republic of
Vietnam that looked like the ant but also destroyed in all of natural
environment when the defendant's US tested newest of weapons. The defendant's US cut and run out of the Republic
of Vietnam without trumpet and drum as
like the first time the defendant's US
came to Republic
of Vietnam Republic
of Vietnam and the defendant's US US US
was taken place when the defendant's US
had sold partnership's Republic of Vietnam to communism in order to protect a core of
interests of the US
_________________
37. (a)Offense.—Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to
commit torture shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results
to any person from conduct prohibited
by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life...
Section 2340A of Title 18, United States Code,
prohibits torture committed by public officials under color of law against persons within the public
official's custody or control. Torture is defined
to include acts specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain
or suffering. (It does not
include such pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions.
https://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/4130.htmDec
11, 2017 ... More information about Vietnam is available on the Vietnam
VI.
INCONCUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff-appellant
respectfully requests that the Court gives and orders for granting the
compensation benefits for suitable with the United States Constitution and
statutory because distort justice is national traitor or justice is long
lasting, but power has short life. Obviously, the justice of a great power is
equally expressed by the Constitution. Because the defendant's US did not only
enforce law of the Vietnam War but also sold the appellant, his real
properties, and small business to communist terrorism in order to protect a
core of interests of the defendant's US. Therefore, the Court should repay in all of the
appellant's properties and compensate his prisoners of War.
Respectfully Yours
