LOYALTY OATH
In his opinion, American officials have not only kept on their oath to be loyal with constitutional rights when they have become the governmental employees but also have self-destroyed their great powerful and modern civilized America. First, the United States Constitution could not classify the governmental employees who are Republican or democrat parties because both parties have only aimed to protect just cause, loyalty, and justice or so-called the Oath of Allegiance has solemnly declared and said, " I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; more importantly, LOYALTY OATH - An oath that declares an individual's allegiance to the government and its institutions and disclaims support of ideologies or associations that oppose or threaten the government. Loyalty oaths are required of government officials, such as the president, members of Congress and state legislatures, and members of the judiciary. Naturalized citizens are required to pledge their allegiance to the United States, as are members of the armed services. Employees in sensitive government positions may also be required to take a loyalty oath. (See U.S.C.A. § 1448; U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 7; U.S. Const. art. VI, cl. 3.) 1&2
In these circumstances, the Supreme Court has not only suggested for the American Governmental employees who are the right to sit on their sublime Constitution but also distorted the Constitutional Rights-therefore; the Loyalty oath has become the no- enforcement by this law is In Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 84 S. Ct. 1316, 12 L. Ed. 2d 377 (1964), while the Supreme Court ordered and therefore, the American Government employees abused power to distort just cause. As a result, the United States Constitution was troublesome. In fact, the tongue without any bones can turn around a thousand ways; you may say whatever you like. Such as the United States of America has solemnly been signed with the Republic of Vietnam for three multilateral and the thirty-seven bilateral treaties which have become to the toilet-pager- because the United States of America has the right to invasion and subversion wars to deprive to life of the innocent Vietnamese people and the human world without having compensated any pennies. For example, After WWII, the humankind would enjoy peace and happiness, but the United States of America has never wished peace and happiness, the United States of America has not only built the fifty invasion and subversion wars on the whole world but also bombed down many countries in the whole world, (see Overthrowing other people’s governments: The Master List by William Blum). Ironically, the proof says, “the court further noted that the defendant could ensure the plaintiffs' loyalty by having them sign a statement that they would not act contrary to the defendant's interests. In City of Boerne v. Flores, 117 S. Ct. 2157 (1997), the Supreme Court struck down RFRA as exceeding Congress's authority to safeguard rights under the FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. The Court held that RFRA was an unconstitutional encroachment on state power.” That is why 28 US Code 1346 the United States as the defendant and 28 US code 1346b- June 25, 1948 –Chapter 171-Tort Claims procedure which is to be demagogy policy if the American court carries out these statutes, the core of national benefits has heavily harmed because the American Government has not only earned good money but also not compensated to any war victims. Let the United States of America give financial aid to the war victims by some words apologizing like General Westmoreland said, “On behalf of the United States Armed Forces I would like to apologize to the Veterans of the South Vietnamese Armed Forces for abandoning you guys.” As a result of the thirty-years of invasion and subversion war in the Republic of Vietnam. This is why the American interests and properties are firmly protected by the law and Constitution when the Vietnamese American war minions were left behind the American laws and Constitution because the First Amendment Constitution solemnly declared and said, “the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws that regulate an establishment of religion, or that prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, when the American people and humankind were expressing this First Amendment; they aren’t the right to request any compensation of benefits’ war victims.
In conclusion, according to special news by https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/revealed-leaked-email-exposes-former-cia-agent-s-role-in-hunter-biden-laptop-cover-up-scandal/ar-AA1gent4? By AA1ge9K1, we would like to realize for LOYALTY OATH which looks like a drawn cake when we have not only enjoyed it but also had never eaten it. Therefore, the United States of America has a special game of hoax which looks like the laws, treaties, and international relations of protocols as the same as if dreaming.
Labor Day 2023 by Author Bright Quang
Cited:
1. (See U.S.C.A. § 1448; U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 7; U.S. Const. art. VI, cl. 3.)
Read more: Loyalty Oath - Further Readings - Government, Court, Required, and Oaths - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/8371/Loyalty-Oath.html#ixzz8COVNzgWm
2. (law.jrank.org/pages/8371/Loyalty-Oath.html)
