For
we understand about a nation or a society when there are not having
formal Principle of Justice, so the unfairness of there is always taken
place by there found uniquely rule let them rule the people within super
magic laws, says Bright Quang.
we understand about a nation or a society when there are not having
formal Principle of Justice, so the unfairness of there is always taken
place by there found uniquely rule let them rule the people within super
magic laws, says Bright Quang.
Dear Senator Bob Casey Sir,
Please
give me share this to you and I would like to ask for you to how would
you think about my case of Civil Settlement? By the way, I would like to
share this to you. When my case of civil Settlement was in the
Department of Justice of the United States of America was more than
seven months always. As you know our government needs to its citizens
within ten days, but your citizen would like to need our American
Government was the seven months, but not yet resolve to civil Settlement
case- However, your democratic Party is always to change what?
give me share this to you and I would like to ask for you to how would
you think about my case of Civil Settlement? By the way, I would like to
share this to you. When my case of civil Settlement was in the
Department of Justice of the United States of America was more than
seven months always. As you know our government needs to its citizens
within ten days, but your citizen would like to need our American
Government was the seven months, but not yet resolve to civil Settlement
case- However, your democratic Party is always to change what?
In
my opinion that, our American Congressmen and Congresswomen should be
given ear to their people when they are trampling down by wrongful
action of government workers from centers to local governments because
you were enacting the statutory Federal Tort Claims Acts in order to
distort to Formal Principle of Justice when our American Government has
been carrying out the law of Animal Rights- Therefore, I would like to
submit my Civil Settlement case to you. Here is not my proposal for
Hearing to Our Congressional. Hopefully, for one day, my Proposal for
Hearing to the United States Congress's Speaker and including a justice
committee of Congressional and House.
my opinion that, our American Congressmen and Congresswomen should be
given ear to their people when they are trampling down by wrongful
action of government workers from centers to local governments because
you were enacting the statutory Federal Tort Claims Acts in order to
distort to Formal Principle of Justice when our American Government has
been carrying out the law of Animal Rights- Therefore, I would like to
submit my Civil Settlement case to you. Here is not my proposal for
Hearing to Our Congressional. Hopefully, for one day, my Proposal for
Hearing to the United States Congress's Speaker and including a justice
committee of Congressional and House.
No._____________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
________________________________
Civ: 358988
Confidential Document: 532272
_________________
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
________________________________
BRIGHT QUANG
Petitioner
V.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent.
_________________________________
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORRARI TO
THE UNITED STATES OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
_______________________
Self Help: Bright Quang
217 5th Ave # 8
Redwood City, CA 94063
(TEL) 650-278-9542
CAPITAL CASE
QUESTION/PRESENTED
I. How does he make a claim for Federal Tort Claims Act l Home | House.gov
for his lost fortune of investment, his Republic of Vietnam, and
imprisoned benefits Insurance of the Vietnam War- whether his personal
injuries, his father who was death without governments duties, which
were not give any Death Certificate when Republic of Vietnam and the
United States of America were partnerships each other.
for his lost fortune of investment, his Republic of Vietnam, and
imprisoned benefits Insurance of the Vietnam War- whether his personal
injuries, his father who was death without governments duties, which
were not give any Death Certificate when Republic of Vietnam and the
United States of America were partnerships each other.
II.
What did his family and he grant for livelihood during they were left
on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without regrets by Foreign
Assistance Act of the United States of America in 1963, because of
Socialism Republic of Vietnam did not have any international relations
with the government of the US and Republic of Vietnam.
What did his family and he grant for livelihood during they were left
on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without regrets by Foreign
Assistance Act of the United States of America in 1963, because of
Socialism Republic of Vietnam did not have any international relations
with the government of the US and Republic of Vietnam.
III.
Would somehow can the defendant's statutory 28 U.S.C § 1346. June
25,1948 understand about to burden sufferings and unluckiness of the
family plaintiff. During, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied
partnership and to should he do for defendant's US that's self
confessed wrongful actions of his litigation.
Would somehow can the defendant's statutory 28 U.S.C § 1346. June
25,1948 understand about to burden sufferings and unluckiness of the
family plaintiff. During, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied
partnership and to should he do for defendant's US that's self
confessed wrongful actions of his litigation.
IV.
Whether the United States of America exactly expressed the
righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality by the
United States Constitution, if not, the Justice of arrogance of
negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy was the United States
of America of the Vietnam War.
Whether the United States of America exactly expressed the
righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality by the
United States Constitution, if not, the Justice of arrogance of
negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy was the United States
of America of the Vietnam War.
TABLE OF PARTIES
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Response
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
QUESTIONS PRESENTED................................................................................... i
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA................................................................ i
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................... ...................... vii
OPINIONS BELOW ................................................... .......................................... 1
JURISDICTION
..................................................................................................
1
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
1
..................................................................................................
1
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
1
BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................2
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND........................................... 2
STATEMENT OF THE CASE....................................................................1..to..55
APPENDIX................................................................................................57 to 308
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.....................................................................iv to vii
S.
484 BRING THEM HOME
ALIVE....................................................................................................................2
484 BRING THEM HOME
ALIVE....................................................................................................................2
9.11
PARTICULAR RIGHTS—FIRST AMENDMENT—"CITIZEN" PLAINTIFF 42
U.S.C.§1983..................................................................................3
PARTICULAR RIGHTS—FIRST AMENDMENT—"CITIZEN" PLAINTIFF 42
U.S.C.§1983..................................................................................3
22 U.S.C § 2451 - Pub. L 87-256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.....................4
22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105.
Oct. 28, 2000-114 Stat. 1473..................................................................................5
22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 461..........5
18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103-322.....................6
10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;
Pub. L. 85–729........................................................................................... ........... 6
22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329-81st Congress, 63 Stat 714
December 23, 1950...........................................................................................7
H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963...................................................... 7
H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88-205. Approved. December 16, 1963.............................8
22 USC§ 2151 Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept4,1961......10
22 USC§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance
December 20, 1975.........................................................................................10
5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966...............................................11
18 U.S.C. § 227-Wrongfully influencing.Sep.14,2007..................................11
26 U.S.C. § 7701.Definition Aug.16,1954....................................................12
28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948..........................................12
21 USC§ 848- Oct. 27 1970..........................................................................13
1 USC§ 112a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950..................................14
1 USC§ 112-General Provision-July 30, 1947..............................................15
1 USC§ 112b. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972..........16
37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6,1966..........................................................................16
5 U.S.C. § 552a-December 31,1974............................................................. 17
38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958.....................................................18
38 U.S.C. §§ 1116-1311-Feb. 6, 1991-.........................................................18
1 U.S.C. § 113 -July 30,1947....................................................................... 18
22 U.S.C. § 7108. - Sep.22, 1961.................................................................19
35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982...............................20
Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983..........................................................22
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals...............................................22
Title VI CRA of 1964-42 U.S.C. § 2000D..................................................22
28 U.S.C. § 4101-Dinfinitions; Aug. 10, 2010............................................23
California Vehicle Code Section 14103,14105, and 13953........................24
18 U.S.C. §1705-- Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......25
California Civil Code§§§ 44,45a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander......25
§46 Division1. person [38-86]....................................................................26
42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference;
Aug. 14, 1935............................................................................................26
17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998......................................27
17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;
Oct. 19, 1976............................................................................................29
42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990........................31
CACI Nos. 3940-3949-DAMAGES-.......................................................33
CACI No.3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual........................................33
28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948.....................................................34
44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;
May 22, 1995............................................................................................36
5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-..............................................37
S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism .......................................39
50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;................................40
50 U.S.C. §4101 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the
United States; July 3, 1948-....................................................................44
28 U.S.C. § 1346b-June 25, 1948-.........................................................45
28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;........................................46
28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims;
June 25, 1948.........................................................................................46
28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948............................47
28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948...................47
28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948......................................48
Amendment XIV...................................................................................49
22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 22. Transfer of
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
to Department of Justice........................................................................49
22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions.............................................49
22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims.............................50
22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation............................51
22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory.............................52
22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980............ ..52
22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement .......................52
18 U.S.C. § 2340A- Torture..................................................................53
The
deadliest of American history was My_lai Material Court in 1967 in the
Vietnam War of the United States of America. As a result, the American
history could not forget to this special event of Prisoner of War of the
Vietnam War of the United States of America and here:
deadliest of American history was My_lai Material Court in 1967 in the
Vietnam War of the United States of America. As a result, the American
history could not forget to this special event of Prisoner of War of the
Vietnam War of the United States of America and here:
We have Animal Rights Doctrine when our humankind has had formal principle of justice- and therefore, Dearest Matt Whitaker Sir,
Dearest Matt Whitaker Sir,
I
would like to appreciate to your email's responds, so I am respectfully
waiting for Department of Justice that should resolve my case 's Civil
settlement for my Prisoner of War of the Vietnam War of the United
States of America because our Great Power of the America that should, at
least, understand about formal principle of justice of a Great Power of
our America is super values when our national America has never had
unmitigated punishment for of fenders. Therefore, our congressional was
enacted statutory when my Civil Settlement was submitted to Attorney
General Jeff Sessions, but he could not resolve to my case's Civil
Settlement, when, he perhaps, was busily for within investigation's
Russian in our voting of in 2016. He seemed forgotten to my modern
slavery war of our America. Because the cause of prisoner of war of the
Vietnam War of the United States of America has had confirmation by
Attorney General of the United States of America who was Robert Kennedy
when he came to Saigon in Vietnam and declared, " The Vietnam War must
win communism." and therefore, the Congressional has had continuously
been enacting for these statutory, which are:
would like to appreciate to your email's responds, so I am respectfully
waiting for Department of Justice that should resolve my case 's Civil
settlement for my Prisoner of War of the Vietnam War of the United
States of America because our Great Power of the America that should, at
least, understand about formal principle of justice of a Great Power of
our America is super values when our national America has never had
unmitigated punishment for of fenders. Therefore, our congressional was
enacted statutory when my Civil Settlement was submitted to Attorney
General Jeff Sessions, but he could not resolve to my case's Civil
Settlement, when, he perhaps, was busily for within investigation's
Russian in our voting of in 2016. He seemed forgotten to my modern
slavery war of our America. Because the cause of prisoner of war of the
Vietnam War of the United States of America has had confirmation by
Attorney General of the United States of America who was Robert Kennedy
when he came to Saigon in Vietnam and declared, " The Vietnam War must
win communism." and therefore, the Congressional has had continuously
been enacting for these statutory, which are:
28
U.S.C. § 1346-June 25, 1948; 28 U.S.C. § 1346 b-June 25, 1948-28 U.S.C.
§2671- Definitions-June 25,1948;28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative
adjustment of Claims; June 25, 1948., 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to
Congress-June 25, 1948.,28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June
25, 1948; 28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948 and:
U.S.C. § 1346-June 25, 1948; 28 U.S.C. § 1346 b-June 25, 1948-28 U.S.C.
§2671- Definitions-June 25,1948;28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative
adjustment of Claims; June 25, 1948., 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to
Congress-June 25, 1948.,28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June
25, 1948; 28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948 and:
22
U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 22. Transfer of Foreign
Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of
Justice; 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions.,22 U.S.C. § 1622c-
Membership of Foreign Claims., 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and
compensation., 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory., 22
U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980 .,22
U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement .
U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 22. Transfer of Foreign
Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of
Justice; 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions.,22 U.S.C. § 1622c-
Membership of Foreign Claims., 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and
compensation., 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory., 22
U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980 .,22
U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement .
In
my opinion that I am respectfully waiting for Attorney General of the
United States of Department Justice that should resolve to my civil
settlement case. if not, after that I should respectfully submit my
Civil Settlement to Supreme Court of the United States of America- If
not, in the end, I would like to carry out the statutory, which is ., 28
U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948., by my proposal for
hearing's Civil Settlement of prisoner of war of the Vietnam War of the
United States of America to the United States Congress that I’d like to
follow with formal principle of justice of a Great Power of our America ,
which is super values of the American Justice when our national America
has never had unmitigated punishment for of fenders. Because my
prisoner of war is exactly proved by not only have the American justice
but also expressed in law by the American statutory of Congressional for
enacting for firm it.
my opinion that I am respectfully waiting for Attorney General of the
United States of Department Justice that should resolve to my civil
settlement case. if not, after that I should respectfully submit my
Civil Settlement to Supreme Court of the United States of America- If
not, in the end, I would like to carry out the statutory, which is ., 28
U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948., by my proposal for
hearing's Civil Settlement of prisoner of war of the Vietnam War of the
United States of America to the United States Congress that I’d like to
follow with formal principle of justice of a Great Power of our America ,
which is super values of the American Justice when our national America
has never had unmitigated punishment for of fenders. Because my
prisoner of war is exactly proved by not only have the American justice
but also expressed in law by the American statutory of Congressional for
enacting for firm it.
Respectfully Yours
Reply
About the Author
Art Degree from California State University, East BayGraduated 2003
Lives in Hayward, CA2000-present
7.5k answer views2.9k this month
