Wednesday, November 22, 2023

The American Super Jurisprudence Were?

The American super Jurisprudences were? In his opinion that he has based on this article to analyze for the legal actions of Ex-president Trump which is why a Vietnamese American naturalized by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when the plaintiff’s Bright Quang has carried out the indigenous law, international law, and the Hague convention, but the constitutional Court has not yet resolved to his settlement case. In fact, the United States Congress has enacted H.Res. 309 the fall of Saigon (1975): The bravery of American Diplomat and refugees. And S. 484- Bring them Home Alive Act- specially having three American leaders who had been relating to the Vietnam War while they had self-confessed wrongful actions in war by their written law in themselves. Therefore, according to a lawsuit of the settlement case or violated criminal while the defendants had self-confessed themselves which is why the Constitutional Court has not resolved to his settlement case. As a result, the plaintiff would like to carry out the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and individual Freedom and the Bill of Rights- Chapter 11- Equal Protection of the Law. Un such circumstances, the United States Department of Secretary of State had not only signed some bilateral treaties to approve the right to self-determination of the sovereignty of the Republic of Vietnam which 12 UST that The American Ambassador to the Vietnamese Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. 152 Saigon, April 4,1961, and Taxation is agreement regarding tax administration. Exchange of notes at Saigon March 31 and May 3, 1967, Entered into force May 3, 1967. 18 UST 546; TIAS 6262; 685 UNTS 207, and 28 USC § 1346 b-the United States as the defendant- June 25, 1948-Chapter 171- Tort Claims Procedure and 22 USC§§ 1571_ 1604 - Pub.L 329-81 St Congress, 63 Sat 714. December 23, 1950. That is why many American excellent legists and sublime jurisprudence have never helped for his settlement case. On the other hand, when the United States of America followed with H.R. 7885-Pub-l 88-205 approved. December 16, 1963, so President Kennedy quickly sent his 400 American Armed Forces to the Republic of Vietnam together with a day, the super legists and sublime jurisprudences have not only praised for the invasion and subversion of the proxy war America in Vietnam but also honored the American Armed Forces to seize the ally of the Republic of Vietnam. In contrast, when the United States of America has not only betrayed its close Vietnam allies but also sold its Vietnam allies to mainland China and killed one excellent million troops of its close Vietnam Armed forces. That is why, the many American legists and super jurisprudence are solemnly silenced to express discrimination against the color racism and impressed by prejudiced indigenous law with the foreign naturalized citizens. In conclusion, why the American political rivals are protected by the laws by much American jurisprudence, during the American Courts have been prosecuting their American political rivals but the 14 Amendment of the US Constitution, but the foreign naturalized citizens are discriminated against the national color racism by the indigenous law. Even so, the United States Congress has enacted the law to invade and subvert the Republic of Vietnam during the United States department of Foreign Affairs has abused power to bully the Republic of Vietnam that has been paid the income tax for the United States of America like the Age of Neo-Colonialism has ruled in Vietnam which is why we, the Vietnamese people and officials paid the income tax for the second mother country in order to protect and rebuild our national Vietnam without having destroyed our sacred Vietnam and sold our country to mainland China like Secretary of state Kissinger has solemnly stated, “ Vietnam failures we did to ourselves.” The USA’s Thanksgiving 2023